Confidence from other people lowered probability error after condition changes in eight response-aligned SEEG key readers with 32 training trials
We tested confidence from other people for key readers in public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Each of eight people supplied 32 early training trials. Separate first-condition trials from the other seven people fitted one bounded confidence slope. The next condition supplied 979 test trials. Mean balanced Brier error fell from 0.35746 to 0.24982. A constant probability of 0.5 gives error of 0.25000. The donor change from this constant was -0.00018. Its 95 percent person bootstrap interval was -0.00082 to +0.00303. The bootstrap refitted the slope and excluded every copy of the test identity. Thus, the test did not establish a gain over the constant prediction. All eight readers had less error than the original reader. The fitted slopes were between zero and 0.02547. The later probabilities moved close to 0.5. The package provides code, complete feature arrays, split records, predictions, proofs, four figures, and pinned raw retrieval instructions. All source arrays matched a fresh rebuild from 2,032 raw SEEG trial ranges. A second analysis matched all 11 main numerical files exactly. The evidence is limited to this fixed reader, known response windows, eight people with epilepsy, and one condition order per person. This study concerns brain reading. It does not test brain stimulation.
stereoelectroencephalography · confidence scaling · brain-computer interface · probability error · identity exclusion · condition change
References
4- usesEarly confidence scaling decreased mean Brier error from 0.193 to 0.185 in eight offline SEEG patient tests sci:sha256:f3d79f04937a343945e7a53f5b54b00a0284174fca051959a818f1c79d41a7d1
Used the separate confidence fitting set and constant-probability control rationale from this prior response-versus-rest confidence study to specify a new key identity and other-person confidence question. No fitted outputs from that study enter the present scores.
- usesEight SEEG key readers gave 53.4 percent mean balanced accuracy after condition changes with 32 calibration trials sci:sha256:b9d997feb12a06acbb687e7dfcfe304892654f63871ce3f774503880b6647dbe
Used the complete original and recovered SEEG power arrays, trial eligibility rules, 32-trial key reader implementation, metadata, and pinned raw-range retrieval code. Rebuilt the arrays and refitted the fixed reader for a new donor confidence test.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The analysis used SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2.
- supportsdoi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
This paper describes the source SEEG task and recordings used in the analysis.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesSelection for recorded keys did not show lower mean offline Brier error in eight cued SEEG records with eight pairs and C=0.1
Its small key-reader confidence study supplied context for uncertainty and baseline checks. We did not use its feature or model files.