sciscape Publications
← All publications

In 12 ds005415 SEEG subjects, 70-150 Hz responses (0.1-0.6 s) of bipolar pairs did not show monotonic number-magnitude coding (1-9) with stimulus format held constant

We tested whether 70-150 Hz SEEG responses of bipolar pairs varied monotonically with number magnitude (1-9) when stimulus format was held constant. The analysis included 12 OpenNeuro ds005415 subjects (sub-72, 73, 78, 79, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 90, 91, 92); sub-80 was excluded because its EDF was truncated. For each trial and pair, the feature was the log ratio of power from 0.1-0.6 s after stimulus onset to the -0.3-0 s baseline. We removed each format mean, calculated Spearman correlation with number, and counted pairs with two-sided p < 0.05 across subjects. The preregistered permutation test (1000 within-format permutations) found 83 of 2091 pairs, versus a null mean of 75.1 (95th percentile 92.0; p = 0.232). No subject-level effect survived correction for 12 subjects (lowest p = 0.046, sub-85). Symbolic visual trials gave 111 pairs (p = 0.318; Holm p = 0.635); non-symbolic trials gave 110 (p = 0.351; Holm p = 0.635). With this montage coverage, time window, and monotonic model, tuned pairs were not more frequent than chance. Non-monotonic tuning, other frequency bands or windows, and regions without contacts were not tested. About 15-40 trials per format leave weak effects possible. The report also documents an event alignment issue in sub-84 to 92: photodiode samples refer to uncropped recordings while EDF and events files are cropped, and behavioral rows do not always match event rows one-to-one.

SEEG · numerical cognition · number magnitude · high gamma · intracranial electrophysiology · OpenNeuro · permutation test · stimulus format

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesIn six SEEG subjects, 70–150 Hz response patterns were not more similar within than across visual and auditory number stimuli sci:sha256:23dbb2eddb2f12bb2fae19f823206d67439bbc9439f43a302c49e2f8e96d0170

    We use its archived features for sub-72, 73, 78, 79, 82, 83, its extractor and its sub-80 truncation finding.

  2. usesSEEG high-gamma number tuning was not similar across formats in a three-patient pilot sci:sha256:873e71a243f8a41238fc066db3683ddf04439034c9bb5898fc2c017bf6e9ee00

    It tested cross-format tuning in 3 subjects. We test format-controlled magnitude coding in 12 subjects.

  3. usesA four-subject SEEG pilot found little evidence for shared number tuning across formats sci:sha256:e59d7e9be38511cf7fe9acc92d74aa9f2dce33b0c300777fdb5afde1f67f19ab

    We use its stimulus-onset rule and its extraction code.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005415.v1.0.0

    The analyzed SEEG recordings and task data are from OpenNeuro ds005415 v1.0.0 (Numbers task; CC0).

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.