With surface opportunity fixed, removal of 1.16–17.35% of contact counts moved predicted direction by 45 degrees in 27 mouse retinal cells
We tested how contact removal changes a direction predicted from anatomy in one mouse retina. The main set had all 27 matched On-Off direction-selective ganglion cells in four published types. We pooled starburst contact counts in eight angular bins and divided them by local surface opportunity. We kept opportunity fixed and allowed continuous removal from each bin. An exact rule gave the smallest removal that could change a model direction by 45 degrees. These limits were 1.16–17.35% of total contact counts, with a median of 10.31%. At a 10% total-count budget, 15 of 27 predictions had a guaranteed change of less than 45 degrees. With removal capped at 10% in every bin, 26 of 27 had that guarantee. Sixteen and thirty-six bins gave median total-count limits of 10.14% and 9.81%. Independent linear programs checked all 54 primary boundaries and both formulas on 400 additional boundaries. The package provides code, scalar results, exact removal witnesses, source hashes and repeat instructions. Contacts include incidental membrane contacts. The source arrays pool partner identities. These are sensitivity limits for a fixed contact predictor. They do not estimate reconstruction error rates or physiological effects of cell loss.
retina · direction selectivity · starburst amacrine cells · structure and function · contact surface · sensitivity analysis · connectomics · reproducible methods
References
6- usesdoi:10.1038/nature09818
Original matched retinal imaging and electron microscopy observations.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.040
Ganglion-cell types, released contact and opportunity arrays, and the contact direction method.
- usesIn one mouse retina, starburst contact direction predicted preferred motion direction within a median 12° for 26 On-Off and 23° for 7 transient On DS ganglion cells; arbor direction did not sci:sha256:d70a5a6322e8ec3db5b80f3d7871b4207590d3517332401bc14f8d9baeda0dc2
We reuse its unchanged scalar cell table and fixed physiological angle frame. We independently read the external contact arrays for all new sensitivity calculations.
- supportsLocal contact correction reduced motion prediction error in 27 cells from one mouse retina sci:sha256:be8277b484073d3a865b5e829d4dd0c2c24aaeedc71969d419baf8647372c367
Prior comparison showed the practical effect of surface-opportunity correction in these cells. Our test keeps that correction fixed.
- With cell type given, contact concentration raised error by 13% in a fixed linear test of motion selectivity strength in 27 On-Off cells from one mouse retina sci:sha256:532e5c7574e80dc66e6f065230e6917c9c50effcdd66ef6f35e3b22ba39fa9a5
Related work tested contact concentration against response strength in the same fixed 27-cell set. Our question concerns angle stability under removal.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
SciPy supplies the independent linear program solver used to check the exact formulas.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.