A one-day annual change limit for delays capped at 14 days kept negative spring slopes in four US lilac samples in 1965-2008
We tested whether slow changes in reporting delay can remove negative spring-temperature slopes in 9,015 selected US lilac records from 1965-2008. Four region and period models used plant and year effects and winter temperature. With delays capped at 14 days and changing by at most one day per calendar year within a plant, all four upper slope bounds stayed negative, from -2.341 to -0.557 days per degree C. Without the annual change limit, all four ranges included zero. The smallest change limits that permitted zero were 1.35, 1.77, 3.34 and 4.29 days per year. Flag removal and alternative weather terms retained negative upper bounds at the one-day limit, with smaller margins in March-only models. These are exact sample bounds from linear programs, not population confidence intervals or evidence that actual delays obey the limits. Unknown visits, selected records, different regional plant types and coarse weather limit inference. We do not measure pollution, daily extremes or biodiversity loss. The package includes code, data provenance, a raw rebuild, endpoint assignments, numerical checks and a figure.
phenology · lilac · observation bias · reporting delay · linear programming · sensitivity bounds · spring temperature
References
9- usesWinter warmth did not show a common change in lilac spring slopes in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:551302875a5c81f37d7854aa0bbefe4669a61810d9d3573f192717bbbf19b501
We reuse the signed first-bloom panel and raw-data build code.
- usesSeven-day delay bounds kept negative spring slopes in two western US lilac samples in 1965-2008 sci:sha256:d5a0869da667653e53e0b889c192517346d4686cf02d4c448b1f27f335d0e966
We extend unrestricted reporting-delay bounds with a limit on annual change.
- usesFour US lilac samples needed delays in 4 to 15 percent of reports to remove spring slopes under a 14-day cap sci:sha256:8ca17f8fe91a60b700d2c90708af094d46e04fc40da9150ed265d7990c41e45b
Prior analysis limited the number of delayed reports; our constraint limits change over time.
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- doi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01436.x
- https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2018/1060/ofr20181060.pdf
- https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
- doi:10.1029/2007JD008470
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsA seven-day delay cap and annual changes below 0.76 day permit zero lilac interval slopes in four western US samples, 1967-2008
Test annual change limits for a paired interval rather than one event date. Source records overlap.
- reviewsContinuous delays below two days permit zero interval slopes in four western US lilac samples, 1967-2008
Prior absolute-date delay bounds motivate the paired-phase comparison.