Fixed shape fits give different alternate event depths for three TESS candidates in sectors 94 and 104
We tested whether short period TESS candidates have different depths in alternate events. We screened 786 NASA TOI entries with periods of 0.15–2.0 days and PC or APC status on 2026-10-21. The screen used the latest sector in frozen MAST responses and gave 630 finite descriptive ratios. We selected three cases for detailed tests. We used fixed catalog periods and an exposure averaged shape. The even-minus-odd depth difference for TOI 3338.01 is +3586 ± 671 ppm in sector 104. TOI 6782.01 gives −7286 ± 1256 ppm in sector 94. TOI 6805.01 gives −2939 ± 722 ppm in sector 94. Errors measure scatter between fitted events under an independent event assumption. SAP fits and 12 single parameter changes preserve each sign. Older QLP sectors do not establish a stable pattern. A shared shape with a quadratic baseline weakens TOI 6782.01 to an absolute difference divided by error of 1.52. TOI 6805.01 reaches the allowed V shape limit. Four ground files for TOI 3338.01 cannot isolate parity from instrument and filter effects. TOI 6782.01 has a prior unvetted TESS Ten Thousand Catalog entry. A QLP sector 104 file with a source timing warning is excluded from scientific comparisons; the main result uses SPOC. The results identify follow-up leads. They do not confirm planets, binaries, or doubled orbital periods. The package preserves code, twelve FITS files, frozen selection data, results, source hashes, and reproduction instructions. The errors exclude model uncertainty and survey selection effects.
TESS · TOI 3338.01 · TOI 6782.01 · TOI 6805.01 · alternate event depths · eclipsing binaries · candidate vetting · public astronomical data · reproducible research
References
10- doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aab694
This paper describes the established odd/even diagnostic in Kepler data validation.
- doi:10.1117/12.2233418
This paper describes SPOC processing for the main TESS observations.
- doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ade2d8
This paper describes the TESS Ten Thousand Catalog used in the prior work check.
- usesdoi:10.26093/cds/vizier/bb-8q-1j
We use complete vetted tables 3 and 4 and exact TIC queries of unvetted table 2.
- usesdoi:10.17909/t9-r086-e880
We use QLP light curves for older sector checks and some initial screen rows.
- doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e
This paper describes QLP primary mission light curves.
- doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2d
This companion paper describes QLP primary mission products.
- usesdoi:10.26134/ExoFOP5
We inspect public target pages and four external ground measurement tables from ExoFOP.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74
Astropy reads the public FITS files.
- ZTF DR24 data do not resolve alternate event depths for TOI-7349.01 at a fixed 2.980341-day period sci:sha256:bbb8e1a9be8f0c1514faab5f6dc5131d8818207a0e5df49a95477b84fb1dbec4
This related study tests a separate TOI alternate depth flag with independent ZTF data. No data or code are reused.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- From TESS Sector 94, QLP eclipse depths of 49 southern CVZ binaries are 11% smaller in the 3x3 aperture and 36% smaller in the 1x1 aperture than before, while SPOC depths do not change
Uses QLP depths in Sector 94. Our result shows that 3x3 QLP depths from Sector 94 are about 11% too small, so its depth differences can be too small by the same factor.