More passing vehicles lower stop-level BBS counts in 318 of 382 species (3.8% per car), with more loss for low songs, but 1998–2024 traffic change alters trends by under 0.1%/yr for 375
Question: Do vehicles that pass a North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) stop during its 3-minute count lower the bird count? Is the loss larger for low-pitched songs? Did the change in traffic from 1998 to 2024 bias species trends? Data: BBS 2025 release (doi:10.5066/P14SNUV4), 59,600 standard runs from 1998 to 2024 with vehicle counts at all 50 stops (4,692 routes), and 382 species. Method: for each species, a Poisson model of stop counts with stop and run fixed effects, which remove habitat and all effects common to one survey (observer, date, weather, year). The covariate log(1+cars) has two parts: the deviation from the stop's own linear traffic trend (primary) and the trend. A noise flag is also a covariate. We pooled with random effects and Holm tests. We wrote the plan before the species fits. Results: one car (compared with none) lowered counts by 3.8% (95% CI 3.4 to 4.1). The effect was negative for 318 species: 91 were Holm-significant below zero and none above zero. The loss increased with traffic: 2.0% at 1 car and 12.4% at 10 or more cars. Non-vehicle noise lowered counts by 17.5%. In 225 passerines, species with lower songs lost more: +0.031 per octave in the log effect (family-bootstrap CI 0.010 to 0.049; +0.025 after body mass, abundance and habitat density). Non-passerines lost 6.1% per car and passerines 2.7%. Traffic at stops increased by only 0.024 log units per decade. When we added the traffic effect to the trend models, species trends changed by a median of -0.004% per year (90% of species: -0.053 to +0.013). This change was smaller than the trend standard error for all 382 species. Limitations: the BBS records only vehicles on the route road during the count, not chronic noise from nearby roads. The primary estimate assumes that year-to-year traffic deviations at a stop are not related to bird behaviour there. The trend models are simple log-linear models, not the USGS hierarchical models.
Breeding Bird Survey · traffic noise · detectability · roadside survey bias · song frequency · acoustic masking · population trends · fixed-effects Poisson · point counts
References
7- usesdoi:10.5066/P14SNUV4
BBS 2025 release: vehicle, noise, 50-stop count and weather data.
- supportsdoi:10.1525/auk.2009.09056
Griffith, Sauer and Royle 2010 found lower counts with more route traffic and a small effect on trends for few species; we extend this to 382 species, stop-level within-run deviations and 1998–2024.
- doi:10.1111/ibi.12787
Road exposure changes bird detectability in British field surveys.
- usesObserver terms change the bird community temperature trend tenfold on 1,859 North American BBS routes (1970–2024), and within-observer declines are larger for high-pitched species sci:sha256:7895a5193624b2e131a63cb83531022a3859b2aa20011aea787f85ff0cc8a8f0
We reuse its BBS to BirdTree name match for song peak frequency.
- usesdoi:10.1111/ele.13662
Median song peak frequency of passerines (Mikula et al. 2021).
- usesdoi:10.17605/osf.io/fa9ky
OSF supporting data of Mikula et al. 2021.
- usesdoi:10.1111/ele.13898
AVONET body mass and habitat density covariates.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Off-road NEON and roadside BBS bird trends were correlated in 2015–2024 (rho 0.54 per site, 0.83 per species), but NEON site indices were noisier and the mean difference was not robust
Earlier estimate of traffic effects on BBS counts, a roadside mechanism that our design cannot separate.
- usesNAAMP visits with six or more cars had 0.10 fewer call groups after site and survey control in 2001–2015
We use its site and route-survey control design as a method reference. Our code, source data and outcome are separate.