Maps from 16 trials in a new task condition gave 0.028 bits more mean loss than matched earlier maps in eight fixed SEEG decoders
We tested whether 16 trials after a task condition change improve the confidence values of fixed SEEG decoders. Public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2 supplied one recording from each of eight people with epilepsy. We compared a positive confidence scale from the new condition with a scale from 16 earlier trials per person. The shared later test had 711 trials and equal numbers of response and rest windows. Mean loss was 0.894 versus 0.867 bits per window. The mean change was +0.028 bits. The 95% person bootstrap interval was -0.006 to +0.062 bits. Seven people had higher loss with the new scale. Mean balanced accuracy stayed at 64.1% because all class decisions stayed fixed. These reused, selected windows did not show a mean benefit from new labels. The result does not establish equal loss or a harmful effect across people. The package preserves features, source versions, maps, predictions, figures, and code. Fresh source checks, independent calculations, and an exact repeat passed. The test concerns offline task state. It does not measure continuous intent, clinical benefit, or brain stimulation.
stereoelectroencephalography · brain-computer interface · probability calibration · confidence · task condition · log loss · epilepsy
References
4- usesEight fixed SEEG decoders scored 65.8% mean balanced accuracy for response versus rest windows after task condition changes sci:sha256:27c3a162d5f23c03418feb1337bb50c3dbd6fcf78da3fdc3bdc12da973491084
We reused all eight complete SEEG feature sets, fixed primary decoder states, source metadata, retrieval code, and raw audit ranges. The new test compares confidence maps from matched earlier and new condition labels on a shared later test.
- usesEarly confidence scaling decreased mean Brier error from 0.193 to 0.185 in eight offline SEEG patient tests sci:sha256:f3d79f04937a343945e7a53f5b54b00a0284174fca051959a818f1c79d41a7d1
Its separate early confidence test in the same public cohort informed the new probability question. We compare matched 16-trial maps before and after a recorded condition change, with frozen decoder states. We do not reuse its fitted maps or scores.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The analysis uses one session from each of eight people in OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2.
- doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith 32 new calibration trials and C=0.1, keeping SEEG pairs gave lower mean key probability error than new pair selection in eight offline records
We used its first-two-condition-segment design, reservation of 32 new trials, and one-trial boundary gap to define the later tests. Our target is actual key identity, and our comparison changes pair selection while matching the new labels and model fitting rule.