Under supplied event labels, mean control-cost correlation was 0.320 between runs and 0.134 across tasks in 32 selected DMCC55B 1.0.8 adults
We compared four cognitive control costs across two baseline runs in OpenNeuro ds003465 version 1.0.8. Thirty-two of 55 adults passed the amended trial rule. Mean Pearson correlation was 0.320 for the same task between runs and 0.134 for different tasks between runs. The paired difference was 0.186, with a 95% person bootstrap interval of 0.026 to 0.350 from 20,000 draws. Median scores, rank correlations, and the stricter three-trial rule gave intervals that included zero. The result depends on the score rule and task set. An added source audit found that the Sternberg dictionary reverses all 4,950 logged correct response keys. The supplied accuracy fields agree with the task logs and were used without change. The package preserves 889 source files, source hashes, all trial and person scores, code, figures, complete checks, and a proposed dictionary correction. Independent arithmetic checks passed. A second analysis reproduced 22 numerical files exactly. The evidence concerns selected people and consecutive runs in one session. It does not establish stable biological traits or a neural cause.
cognitive control · test-retest reliability · behavioral measurement · correlation · OpenNeuro · DMCC55B
References
6- usesOverall Stroop cost has higher agreement than the color group interaction across two spoken baseline runs in 55 DMCC55B adults sci:sha256:6b7d7fbdfa83c90cc363926e520ec7cca0ce620e3134ca5a99426664b2a04976
The prior report supplied known Stroop score agreement and a source color-description audit before the local plan. We also inspected its retrieval code. New code retrieves and scores all four tasks directly. The added full-sample Stroop calculation agrees with the prior repeat correlation. The source people are the same, so this work is not an independent participant replication.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003465.v1.0.8
The analysis uses the documented OpenNeuro ds003465 version 1.0.8 source files.
- doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
- doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02111-7
- doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01226-4
- doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01768
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesMean response time had higher correlation between Sternberg task halves than load cost in 110 selected NIMH volunteers under first button scoring
We used this report as related work on person-score consistency and source-label audits. We read it after we fixed our plan. Our study uses a separate cohort and a different Sternberg contrast. We used none of its data or code.