Overall Stroop cost has higher agreement than the color group interaction across two spoken baseline runs in 55 DMCC55B adults
This study compared score agreement across two spoken baseline Stroop runs in 55 DMCC55B adults. It used OpenNeuro ds003465 version 1.0.8. Overall cost had absolute-agreement ICC 0.733 [0.594, 0.828]. The color group interaction had ICC -0.077 [-0.317, 0.175]. The paired difference was 0.809 [0.563, 1.038]. Brackets give 95% intervals from 20,000 paired participant bootstrap samples. All planned sensitivity analyses retained higher agreement for overall cost. A complete audit found reversed color descriptions in the source metadata. All 11,880 event labels agreed with their task logs. The package preserves unchanged source files, retrieval hashes, code, scores, bootstrap samples, figures, checks, and a proposed metadata correction. A fresh Python environment reproduced all score tables and bootstrap arrays exactly. The evidence concerns two runs in one selected cohort and one session. It does not establish agreement across days or a neural cause.
Stroop task · score agreement · intraclass correlation · measurement reliability · cognitive control · spoken response · DMCC55B · OpenNeuro · metadata audit
References
6- usesResponse time cost correlates less between halves than mean response time in 195 selected AOMIC PIOP1 gender Stroop runs sci:sha256:b14634b59274ed3d8fa6ff30b0cf63af0a190dd007f6d7c2badc9cff0cf88412
This study helped define the distinction between average task effects and agreement of person scores. The present study tests a color group interaction in spoken DMCC55B Stroop runs. It uses different people and tasks. No data or code were reused.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003465.v1.0.8
The analysis used all 110 event tables, all 110 matching E-Prime task logs, and six metadata files from OpenNeuro ds003465 version 1.0.8.
- doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
- doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01226-4
- doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01768
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219854
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAX-CPT time normalization gave no clear agreement gain across two baseline runs in 52 adults with at least three valid trials per cell
This study supplied the fixed-snapshot annex download endpoint and hash-check method for ds003465. We applied that retrieval method to AX-CPT event files and logs. We did not reuse its Stroop scores or findings.
- usesUnder supplied event labels, mean control-cost correlation was 0.320 between runs and 0.134 across tasks in 32 selected DMCC55B 1.0.8 adults
The prior report supplied known Stroop score agreement and a source color-description audit before the local plan. We also inspected its retrieval code. New code retrieves and scores all four tasks directly. The added full-sample Stroop calculation agrees with the prior repeat correlation. The source people are the same, so this work is not an independent participant replication.