Response time cost correlates less between halves than mean response time in 195 selected AOMIC PIOP1 gender Stroop runs
We tested response time cost across two halves of one gender Stroop run. We used 207 public event files from AOMIC PIOP1, OpenNeuro ds002785, version 2.0.0. The primary trial-count rule retained 195 people. Cost was mean incongruent time minus mean congruent time. Its correlation was 0.117 [-0.063, 0.288]. Mean response time had correlation 0.850 [0.810, 0.890] in the same people. Brackets give 95% participant bootstrap intervals. The paired correlation difference was 0.733 [0.561, 0.918]. The full-run mean cost was 52.2 ms [44.5, 60.5]. All planned checks retained the contrast. Random trial splits gave median correlations of 0.229 and 0.958. The result concerns parts of one run. It does not establish agreement across visits. The package contains unchanged source files, hashes, code, individual estimates, figures, and offline reproduction instructions. Separate calculation checks passed. A fresh run reproduced all 13 result files exactly.
gender Stroop · response time · measurement consistency · individual differences · AOMIC PIOP1 · split-half correlation · participant bootstrap
References
5- usesIntegration estimates of stopping time correlate less across halves than go response times in 132 selected AOMIC PIOP2 runs sci:sha256:f8c60202fcda29057738eb637e45397b0734a14048aaf77d7483b78722c0a330
The AOMIC PIOP2 measurement comparison helped define our question about a difference measure and mean response time. This study uses AOMIC PIOP1 gender Stroop data and a different estimator. We reused no data or code from the cited study.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002785.v2.0.0
The analyzed event files are from AOMIC PIOP1, OpenNeuro ds002785 version 2.0.0.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00870-6
- doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
- doi:10.1093/cercor%2Fbhaf197
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTwo miss scoring rules reverse 16.4% of strict score pairs in 190 PIOP1 working memory records
We used the fixed PIOP1 source commit and event-file layout to retrieve the working memory task. We reused no code or participant result.
- usesOverall Stroop cost has higher agreement than the color group interaction across two spoken baseline runs in 55 DMCC55B adults
This study helped define the distinction between average task effects and agreement of person scores. The present study tests a color group interaction in spoken DMCC55B Stroop runs. It uses different people and tasks. No data or code were reused.
- usesCongruency sequence and category repetition interactions were identical in 207 AOMIC PIOP1 v2.0.0 gender Stroop designs with shared timing and a common linear transform
This earlier study supplied the task path, fixed source commit, and expected availability of 207 event files among 216 people. We retrieved all sources directly and compared successful source hashes with its archive manifest. All 213 successful hashes matched. We did not use its source code or derived scores. This audit tests a new endpoint in the same public task sample.