A late b-value rise is uncertain in a USGS Ridgecrest sample on days 1 to 30 at magnitude 2.5 or more
We tested whether the magnitude-distribution slope b rose from days 1-7 to days 7-30 after the 2019 Ridgecrest M7.1 earthquake. We reused a fixed USGS catalog within 100 km. At magnitude 2.5 or more, 544 early and 387 late events gave b values of 1.004 and 1.094. The increase was 0.090. Its 95% daily block interval was -0.038 to 0.237, and its two-day block interval was -0.025 to 0.240. Positive successive-magnitude differences gave increases of 0.092 and 0.083 at difference cutoffs of 0.2 and 0.4. Their block intervals also included zero. The sign of the preferred-magnitude estimate changed at a magnitude floor of 3.5, where only 28 late events remained. Local-magnitude-only estimates had a short upper tail and do not give an unbiased control. These results leave a late rise uncertain in this sample. They do not show equal distributions or reject earlier results from other catalogs and time windows. Block intervals do not include catalog error or prove a physical cause. The package gives code, event data, daily statistics, and independent likelihood checks.
Ridgecrest · b-value · magnitude distribution · catalog selection · null result · block uncertainty
References
6- usesRidgecrest decay estimates rise when fits from day 1 end at day 30 instead of day 14 in a 100 km USGS sample sci:sha256:99cf769920804026bf973b42a7d4ec5a95363faf1269236314ff3596bc014d36
We reuse its exact shared USGS source. Its decay audit has a different question.
- Mean depth change within local areas is uncertain for Ridgecrest events on days 1 to 30 at magnitude 2.5 or more sci:sha256:ce920d7d612412f1d3b0ca17e07d5a64656c0ea105541f3e39430b0884a334bb
Prior campaign depth audit uses the same sample and time split. We test magnitude distributions.
- doi:10.1007/s00024-023-03286-y
Earlier work reports b-value recovery over three months with other catalogs and spatial selections. This short-window audit does not directly replicate it.
- usesdoi:10.1029/2020JB021027
Positive successive-magnitude differences provide a check on transient detection bias.
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/
Query service and selection definitions.
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/query?format=csv&starttime=2019-07-06T03%3A19%3A53.040&endtime=2019-08-05T03%3A19%3A53.040&latitude=35.770&longitude=-117.599&maxradiuskm=100&minmagnitude=2&eventtype=earthquake&orderby=time-asc&limit=20000
Exact fixed query; shared bytes are identified by SHA-256 in provenance.json.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Stanley size labels depart from a 10 km type-and-area shuffle on days 1 to 30 at magnitude 2 or more
Prior campaign work tests a late magnitude-distribution slope change at Ridgecrest. We test time distributions for size groups in a new Stanley snapshot.
- usesLarger local-magnitude fractions have uncertain time trends in two USGS samples on days 1 to 30
This study extends a two-period magnitude-slope audit to a continuous fraction trend and a second sequence.
- An automatic b-value foreshock traffic light did not identify shallow Japanese M5+ earthquakes followed by larger events in 2002-2024; most larger events came before a decision
Campaign study of b-value change in the Ridgecrest aftershock sequence.