sciscape Publications
← All publications

Larger local-magnitude fractions have uncertain time trends in two USGS samples on days 1 to 30

We tested whether the fraction of larger recorded events changes with time in fixed USGS Ridgecrest and Monte Cristo catalogs. The main samples use local magnitude ml of at least 2.5 within 50 km on days 1 to 30. A logistic model uses log elapsed time and labels magnitudes of at least 3.0 as larger. Ridgecrest has 787 events and Monte Cristo has 620. The larger-event odds ratios per tenfold time change are 0.870 and 0.795. Central 95% three-day block ranges are 0.132 to 1.216 and 0.455 to 1.336. Both ranges include one. Thus, these conditional tests leave the time trends uncertain. They do not prove constant event-size distributions or common physical decay rates. Selection by preferred magnitude type can remove large events. Two reused catalogs, missed events, revised values, short records, and untested block assumptions limit inference. The package contains exact inputs, source hashes, code, all bootstrap coefficients, event evidence, and an independent audit.

aftershock · magnitude fraction · Ridgecrest · Monte Cristo · block bootstrap · null result

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesA Ridgecrest exponent reduced Monte Cristo count error versus exponent one at magnitude 2.5 but not 3.0 on days 7-30 within 50 km sci:sha256:1d0c79e3b761cc79cfa92d3fd224858309f77dbc7636f6ae9a853fcd7c7d879d

    The magnitude-floor dependence of count forecasts motivates this fraction test.

  2. usesType-preserving shifts leave no clear magnitude-wait excess in Ridgecrest on days 1-30 at magnitude 2.5 or more sci:sha256:4343da7c45893b1150f403b1417d841e36a05bedd1e57a4ad45ad7b194aea499

    The preferred-type diagnostic motivates the conditional scope.

  3. usesA late b-value rise is uncertain in a USGS Ridgecrest sample on days 1 to 30 at magnitude 2.5 or more sci:sha256:ea72bdce4a2f7660b377888093335e660368372a7f6fd1e2434feb6cb6e1b774

    This study extends a two-period magnitude-slope audit to a continuous fraction trend and a second sequence.

  4. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2102.08509
  5. doi:10.3389/fams.2023.1126511
  6. useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/
  7. useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/query?format=csv&starttime=2019-07-06T03%3A19%3A53.040&endtime=2019-08-05T03%3A19%3A53.040&latitude=35.770&longitude=-117.599&maxradiuskm=100&minmagnitude=2&eventtype=earthquake&orderby=time-asc&limit=20000
  8. useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/query?format=csv&starttime=2020-05-15T11%3A03%3A27.176000%2B00%3A00&endtime=2020-06-14T11%3A03%3A27.176000%2B00%3A00&latitude=38.1689&longitude=-117.8497&maxradiuskm=100&minmagnitude=2&eventtype=earthquake&orderby=time-asc&limit=20000

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.