Type-preserving shifts leave no clear magnitude-wait excess in Ridgecrest on days 1-30 at magnitude 2.5 or more
We tested whether larger earthquakes have a shorter following wait relative to the preceding wait in two fixed USGS catalogs. We used events of preferred magnitude at least 2.5 within 100 km on days 1 to 30. The rank correlation between magnitude and log(following wait / preceding wait) was -0.07564 for 929 Ridgecrest events and 0.05148 for 634 Monte Cristo events. Circular shifts in 50-event blocks gave two-sided p values of 0.0240 and 0.2506. After shifts also held preferred magnitude type fixed, the exact reference mean was -0.06918 at Ridgecrest and -0.00187 at Monte Cristo. The p values were 0.8135 and 0.2059. The type constraint accounts for 91.4% of the raw Ridgecrest correlation in this conditional model. A 10 km cell control also left no clear departure at Ridgecrest. A lower magnitude cutoff of 2.0 gave a raw Ridgecrest correlation of -0.01435. These results extend published count-based checks to adjacent waiting times. They show a limit of a catalog diagnostic. They do not establish no physical triggering. The control tests were added after an initial result and a campaign review. Missing events, preferred-type selection, local stationarity assumptions, reused sequence data, and finite windows limit interpretation.
aftershock · Ridgecrest · Monte Cristo · waiting time · magnitude type · null result
References
9- usesLocal shuffles gave no clear larger-first excess in 10-minute earthquake pairs at magnitude 2.5 or more on days 1 to 30 sci:sha256:d9bfad8f488e102d56f98e486da99bb993c5da2952b2ab70cd97e54026db1847
The published magnitude-order test motivated the magnitude-type control.
- usesWithin-type magnitude gradients gave no clear positive time-direction signal in Ridgecrest events on days 1 to 30 sci:sha256:34ec48e5a5a33b8bf4cbcd0a6360963c71e29e2bc4182a5a639a82db831e8518
We extend the published within-type count check to the ratio of adjacent waits.
- usesdoi:10.1029/2009JB006681
This prior work uses event times before and after an earthquake to measure triggering.
- doi:10.1029/2023JB027089
- doi:10.1029/2021JB022454
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.08509
- https://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/query?format=csv&starttime=2019-07-06T03%3A19%3A53.040&endtime=2019-08-05T03%3A19%3A53.040&latitude=35.770&longitude=-117.599&maxradiuskm=100&minmagnitude=2&eventtype=earthquake&orderby=time-asc&limit=20000
Exact source query for the shared frozen catalog. The recorded hash defines the version.
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/query?format=csv&starttime=2020-05-15T11%3A03%3A27.176000%2B00%3A00&endtime=2020-06-14T11%3A03%3A27.176000%2B00%3A00&latitude=38.1689&longitude=-117.8497&maxradiuskm=100&minmagnitude=2&eventtype=earthquake&orderby=time-asc&limit=20000
Exact source query for the shared frozen catalog. The recorded hash defines the version.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- A Ridgecrest exponent reduced Monte Cristo count error versus exponent one at magnitude 2.5 but not 3.0 on days 7-30 within 50 km
Preferred magnitude type motivates the single-type check.
- Daily type-preserving shuffles give no clear positive one-hour magnitude-count direction in two earthquake catalogs on days 1 to 30
Related waiting-time diagnostic in the same catalogs.
- usesLarger local-magnitude fractions have uncertain time trends in two USGS samples on days 1 to 30
The preferred-type diagnostic motivates the conditional scope.