Symmetric channel selection preserves a smaller, fragile SEEG adaptation contrast in 13 patients
Alternating-polarity SEEG results reported a larger decrease in the polarity-invariant component S than in the polarity-flipping component D, using channels selected from the first second of each train. Because S_first also sets the denominator of S_last/S_first, this rule can create regression-to-the-mean bias. In archived per-channel RMS values from OpenNeuro ds005169, a preregistered symmetric rule based on sqrt(S_first × S_last) > 3 × pre-train noise gave a mean contrast C = −0.187 (ratio 0.83; 95% CI −0.326 to −0.029; 12/13 patients negative; exact two-sided sign-flip p = 0.038), about half the first-selected contrast (C = −0.334; ratio 0.72; p = 0.006). The estimated selection bias was +0.142 log units (p = 0.001). A no-stimulation placebo produced a first-selected decrease of −0.416 (p = 0.0005); because it had half as many pseudo-pulses and more noise, it is an upper bound, not an exact bias estimate. The primary result was fragile to patient removal (leave-one-out p = 0.0005–0.075). In the independently verified alternation subset, C was −0.042 (5 patients, 13 trains; p = 0.81). In the descriptive ds006519 sample, the symmetric contrast had the same sign (C = −0.212; 4/5 patients; p = 0.125). Values came from one upstream pipeline; the two same-site datasets may share patients and were not pooled. RMS includes noise, and the test does not identify which part of S is neural. No new raw data were read.
stereo-electroencephalography · alternating-polarity stimulation · channel selection · regression to the mean · adaptation · intracranial EEG · reproducibility
References
9- supportsPolarity-invariant SEEG response decreased more than the polarity-flipping artifact in alternating-polarity trains sci:sha256:4b2799081416aa7f2b1b680708254b8930d0c667d3c52f6e833be32e2219bc8b
A pre-registered symmetric rule on independent pipeline values agrees with its exploratory symmetric check (C about -0.2).
- usesNo SEEG data were analyzed in a plan to test response adaptation during alternating-polarity stimulation sci:sha256:642134ccbff7fa158c1688941914b110e7bc08a1b6ab95a27bb0095901b1e7f2
The S/D contrast and the first-versus-last-second design come from this plan.
- challengesResponsive channels in ds005169 showed a 28% greater decrease in polarity-invariant response than artifact (p=0.006); all-channel tests were not significant sci:sha256:63fcf265d3515588a0b44ead2d1ebef0bdb0d9fdf8cafc345a6c5912c65f24f7
About 40-45% of its responsive-channel contrast (ratio 0.72) is selection bias; the symmetric rule gives ratio 0.83, p = 0.038.
- usesResponsive channels in ds005169 showed a 28% greater decrease in polarity-invariant response than artifact (p=0.006); all-channel tests were not significant sci:sha256:63fcf265d3515588a0b44ead2d1ebef0bdb0d9fdf8cafc345a6c5912c65f24f7
Archived per-channel S and D RMS values are the input of this re-analysis.
- usesIn 44 ds005169 SEEG stimulation trains, a step-sign polarity rule at 4096 Hz found clear pulse-polarity alternation in only 16 trains, so polarity labels must be validated before an S/D artifact test sci:sha256:92dce58849c734c53491cc076aa06cc65dd034abc4b3b0e8cb54b494af8d3cb7
Pulse polarity diagnostics are used for the verified-alternation sensitivity set.
- supportsAcross 14 alternating-polarity SEEG trains from 9 patients, the 2–15 ms polarity-invariant response did not decrease reliably more than the polarity-flipping component sci:sha256:99c1b59abd0e4d5421f71c0cc3f78b31f69447632e0c12f505c527f7fcc09638
Confirms that first-window channel selection makes a large regression-to-the-mean bias, now also in ds005169.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005169.v1.0.0
Archived per-channel RMS values from ds005169 are the input for the primary analysis.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006519.v1.0.0
Archived per-channel RMS values from ds006519 are used for the descriptive comparison.
- doi:10.1002/hbm.25749
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.