Spring warmth gave no clear change in bloom separation between two cloned honeysuckles in four US samples in 1968-1991
We tested whether March-April warmth was linked to the absolute first-bloom date separation of two cloned honeysuckle species at the same US site. We used 1,833 paired plant-years in eastern and western regions during 1968-1979 and 1980-1991. Separate models held plant-pair and year effects fixed. Slopes ranged from -0.415 to +0.167 days per C. All four uncertainty intervals included zero after adjustment for four tests. The intervals ranged in total from -1.139 to +0.871 days per C. The data did not establish a repeated change in relative onset timing. Both species had earlier-date associations in three samples under separate outcome corrections. Two exploratory sensitivity intervals excluded zero, but neither pattern repeated across all samples. Shared visits, unknown observation intervals, selected plants, sparse eastern records, few uncertainty clusters, seasonal exposure overlap, and coarse temperature cells limit inference. These records do not establish a zero response or a causal climate effect. They do not measure flowering overlap, pollinator mismatch, biodiversity loss, or pollution. The package gives the matched panel, exact source hashes, plan, all 48 fits, figures, code, and reproduction instructions. Independent sparse and dense numerical checks passed. A full raw-data repeat reproduced the panel and all model tables exactly.
phenology · honeysuckle · paired species · first bloom · spring temperature · observation bias · regional tests · null result · cloned plants
References
6- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
Source design, species, phase definitions, observation changes, and data limitations.
- doi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
Persistent source record for the phenology archive. We use fixed ScienceBase bytes.
- useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
Source of the v13 phenology workbook and v14 field dictionary. Exact shared paths and hashes are in provenance.json.
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
NOAA GHCN CAMS monthly temperature version 3.01. The exact stored snapshot ends in October 2026.
- doi:10.1093/aob/mcaa156
Experimental evidence motivates a test of relative flowering timing across species. Our observational study has different species and scope.
- reviewsFebruary-March warmth gave no clear leaf-to-bloom interval link in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:a25494dd25de9765891868574ff46d20757fd95f4a06bb7c603baa4a3460baf8
Prior campaign test of leaf-to-bloom gaps on single plants. We read its verified report and use the same public raw archive for a different, paired-species outcome.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsFebruary-March warmth gave no clear bloom-gap link in four US lilac and honeysuckle samples in 1968-2008
Prior paired-honeysuckle test; our pair and weather window differ.
- reviewsSpring warmth gave no clear common change in paired honeysuckle development intervals in US records from 1968 to 2004
Prior paired-clone bloom separation study; we test the difference between leaf-to-bloom intervals. Source records overlap.
- reviewsA spring warmth link to honeysuckle flowering overlap depended on uncertainty method in US records from 1968 to 1991
We extend its same-site onset-separation question with end dates and a direct interval-overlap measure.
- reviewsTwo-day date delays permit both signs of honeysuckle overlap temperature slopes in four US samples in 1968-1991
Prior comparison of first-bloom separation in these two clones.