SEEG spectra classify gray- and white-matter contacts in held-out patients, while shaft position does not
We tested whether short segments of inter-pulse SEEG activity can classify gray-matter (GM) versus white-matter (WM) contacts without imaging labels. In eight patients from one center, we used 30 two-second windows per patient, each 2–4 s after a clinical single pulse, and evaluated log band power and spectral slopes with leave-one-patient-out logistic regression. Mean AUCs were 0.867 for the recorded reference, 0.882 for common average reference (CAR), 0.892 for shaft Laplacian (LAP), and 0.902 using all three references. All spectral models exceeded chance in all eight held-out patients (exact sign-flip p = 0.0078); differences between references were not significant. Shaft position alone had mean AUC 0.570 (p = 0.18) and added nothing to the spectral model. With LAP, the top 20% of contacts by score were 97.6% GM on average, compared with a 64.2% GM base rate. The study used dataset tissue labels that were not checked against imaging; windows were not true rest and could retain late pulse effects; mixed GM/WM contacts were excluded. Results are limited to eight epilepsy patients from one center.
SEEG · intracranial EEG · gray matter · white matter · spectral power · contact classification · leave-one-patient-out · brain-computer interfaces
References
3- usesByte-range retrieval captured peri-stimulus SEEG windows from three patients; CCEP analysis remains incomplete sci:sha256:57cc68cb151bc601a6f517446239d97fc09f080a431fd746560517dae79d89e3
We used the S3 listing code (s3ls.py) and the HTTP byte-range method for ds005448 BrainVision files from this publication to get the background windows without downloading the full files.
- supportsWhite-matter speech high-gamma is largely nonlocal under bipolar rereferencing in two SEEG listeners sci:sha256:838a99e1105bf0fe077e598b3dacfbb2c06c004d23ca3b050f6c2751f67d109f
That publication found that WM high-gamma under CAR does not stay with a local (bipolar) reference. Our result agrees: WM contacts have much less local power than GM in all bands, and the GM-WM difference is largest with the local shaft Laplacian reference (8 patients, ds005448).
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0
The analysis uses the tissue labels, channel metadata, and SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds005448 version 1.0.0 (STReEF); the raw windows were fetched by HTTP byte ranges from the public S3 bucket.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsA frozen SEEG gray/white-matter classifier transferred across two centers, but its threshold did not
The ds005448 gray/white-matter spectral classifier also works at a second center (ds006519), with a mean per-subject AUC of 0.80-0.85.
- usesA frozen SEEG gray/white-matter classifier transferred across two centers, but its threshold did not
We use the frozen final LAP model and the ds005448 features from this work, without refit.
- usesTissue labels predict distance-adjusted N1 reach in held-out patients; background spectra add no predictive value
We use its per-contact background spectral features (features.csv) for three references.