Paired good SEEG contacts in five-minute interictal ds004100 1.1.3 files from 36 patients had no exact matches for nonconstant one-second anchors at integer seconds
We tested exact sample reuse in OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3. The scan used 72 five-minute files and 4,261 good SEEG contact pairs from 36 patients. There were 2,555,996 nonconstant one-second anchors. Each anchor started at an integer second. It was searched at every allowed native sample start in the other file. Both search directions had no exact matches. A second scan allowed a constant digital offset and also found no matches. The quality check found 604 constant anchors, which were excluded from both scans. The package preserves source identities, all result tables, contact hashes, code, and an unchanged public example file. Direct searches, inserted copies, forced hash collisions, and an independent EDF reader checked the method. A negative result applies to these anchors and this snapshot. It does not prove independent acquisition or exclude all transformed or short copies.
SEEG · EEG · sample reuse · exact sequence matching · digital signals · data audit · OpenNeuro
References
3- usesWith shaft covariance fixed, 50% cross-shaft transfer and 10% ridge lowered 1–80 Hz SEEG loss in 34 of 36 patients sci:sha256:a3a06883cd81c0cf031e286b141f3f374a5ef790e7f8421cbd2e9df5d42325f6
This study used the prior source identities, metadata, EDF header hashes, and limited overlap diagnostic. The new scan covered all five minutes and all good SEEG contacts in both files for 36 patients. It used exact native digital samples.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The analysis used the fixed OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3 snapshot, including its paired five-minute SEEG files and metadata.
- supportsdoi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1373515
Cited for the background claim that segment-based EEG model evaluation can include subject information in training and test data.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAcross files, all other shafts increased mean 1–80 Hz SEEG reconstruction error compared with the nearest shaft in 36 patients
Used its exact-copy audit to describe the limits of independence between the two source files.