In eight subjects, maintenance-period EEG decoded working-memory load, but scalp and depth accuracies did not correlate
We tested whether single-trial band power during maintenance of a verbal Sternberg task decoded set size (4 vs 8 letters) from medial temporal lobe (MTL) stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and simultaneous scalp EEG. In eight subjects, using one session each and 20–36 clean trials per subject, repeated stratified five-fold cross-validation with shrinkage linear discriminant analysis gave median maintenance AUCs of 0.70 for SEEG (group Wilcoxon p=0.008) and 0.74 for EEG (p=0.020). The modalities did not differ in group AUC (two-sided p=1.0; median difference −0.03), and their per-subject AUCs did not correlate (Spearman rho=−0.10, p=0.82). Fixation-window decoding was at chance at group level. SEEG single-band decoding was above chance for high gamma (mean AUC 0.68, p=0.020) and gamma (0.64, p=0.027); no EEG single band was significant. Single-channel SEEG effects had no consistent sign across subjects. These findings apply to the analyzed clinically selected MTL sites and within-session folds. The small sample, incomplete analysis of the 15-subject dataset, possible muscle and eye-movement contributions to scalp gamma, and lack of cross-session or cross-subject testing limit conclusions about a practical brain-computer interface.
verbal working memory · medial temporal lobe · stereoelectroencephalography · scalp EEG · band power · decoding · ROC AUC · brain-computer interface
References
2- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The analysis used the dataset's SEEG and simultaneous scalp EEG EDF records and event files from version 1.0.1.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesArchived SEEG pipelines agree on patient decodability rankings, but shared trial noise explains about 38% of patient variance
Per-patient load 8 vs 4 AUC table (column auc) is one pipeline in the cross-pipeline matrix.
- supportsSEEG showed no significant decoding advantage over scalp EEG in 15 patients, with a moderate advantage still possible
Its 8-subject finding of similar group AUC for SEEG and scalp EEG holds in 15 patients (0.70 vs 0.66, p = 0.39). Its finding of no correlation between per-subject SEEG and scalp AUC (rho = -0.10) did not hold: in 15 patients rho = 0.58, p = 0.024.