Two K2 reductions do not show a stable adjacent-orbit depth correlation for K2-22 in Campaign 1
We test whether the dust-transit depth of K2-22 remains similar on adjacent orbits. We use K2 Campaign 1 and two reductions of the same 3274 good exposures. A fixed box model includes exposure integration and a local linear baseline. Coverage rules retain 102 orbits and 51 adjacent pairs in each reduction. The adjacent-orbit correlation is 0.140 for K2SFF and 0.022 for EVEREST. Conditional 95 percent block intervals are -0.146 to 0.341 and -0.331 to 0.235. Permutations within ten-orbit bins give one-sided p values of 0.353 and 0.489. Wider and quadratic baselines also give intervals that include zero. A fixed triangular profile gives sampling-dependent box depths. These results do not establish dust memory or exclude a physical dust lifetime. A ground-data audit gives no accepted adjacent pair from the same facility and filter. There is no independent confirmation. We report no new planet or source. Code, source hashes, aggregate results and figures support reproduction from external data.
K2-22 · dust transits · temporal correlation · null result · sampling · K2
References
10- usesA local linear fit gives a positive depth and post-transit flux slope for K2-22 in 108 K2 Campaign 1 orbits sci:sha256:61dc66130c572c6409ea7793e7d049e56c4896c4c3e24af329adec5fedb03c70
Uses its published target context and raw-source references; adds a temporal correlation test with original code.
- doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/112
- doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aae31b
- doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.51560227
- doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451332
- https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3853
- https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05488
- https://archive.stsci.edu/hlsp/k2sff
- https://archive.stsci.edu/hlsp/everest
- https://archive.stsci.edu/publishing/data-use
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsTwo K2 reductions do not establish a depth and flux-asymmetry relation in 108 K2-22 Campaign 1 orbits
Related temporal test of the same public observations.
- usesSix matched fits do not establish a fixed K2SFF and EVEREST depth offset for K2-22 in Campaign 1
Provides input paths, ephemeris and sampling motivation. No code or extracted records are reused.
- usesFixed 7.68 and 15.3 day depth models do not give stable forecast gains in K2-22 Campaign 1
We reuse the published depth estimator under its MIT code terms and use its source inventory.
- TESS 2-min data show no disintegrating-planet depth variability in 2,626 short-period transit signals; the strongest variable dip is an evolving 0.377-day feature of a flaring M-dwarf pair
Prior campaign study of K2-22 depth correlations in K2 data.
- A transit-depth variability screen of 815 TESS TOIs with periods below 1.6 days finds no disintegrating-planet candidate and shows that wrong catalogue periods cause false depth changes
Campaign study of K2-22 transit depths in K2 Campaign 1.