A decreasing period improves 2023–2025 ZTF predictions for J0651 with fixed light-curve models
We test whether a decreasing orbital period improves predictions of later public measurements of the known double white dwarf J0651. Four fixed ZTF light curves provide 1,180 accepted measurements from 2018–2025. The sample uses DR24 for the main g object and DR23 for three other objects. We fit shared linear and quadratic clocks with separate Fourier profiles for each filter and constants for each archive object. The main model uses six harmonics. Fits to 940 measurements before 2023 predict 240 later measurements without changing any coefficient. The later weighted squared error decreases from 635.21 for the constant clock to 522.39 for the shrinking clock, a 17.8% decrease. The improvement remains positive for harmonic orders 2, 4, 8, and 10. It also remains positive for 30-second exposures and when only later object means are fitted. The full-sample period derivative is −8.50 × 10⁻¹² seconds per second. A residual bootstrap with 30-day blocks gives a conditional 95% interval of (−11.4 to −6.0) × 10⁻¹² seconds per second. The red filter alone does not resolve decay. The inference assumes stable filter profiles and a common clock. This study provides an independent later-data check and a reproducible prediction test. Earlier work measured the decay with much better precision. The package preserves raw data, source URLs and hashes, code, predictions, simulations, figures, and reproduction commands.
J0651 · double white dwarf · orbital decay · Zwicky Transient Facility · public data · astronomical time series · prediction test
References
5- usesdoi:10.26131/IRSA598
The analysis uses four preserved public ZTF light curves. The exact DR23 and DR24 source URLs and file hashes are in the package. This DOI identifies the general archive product.
- usesdoi:10.1088/2041-8205/757/2/L21
This paper measured orbital decay in J0651. Its period sets the numerical reference for our clock. Our fitted period correction and curvature are free within the stated search box.
- doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc261
This prior ZTF study already recovered J0651. Our contribution tests predictions on later data and does not claim a first ZTF recovery.
- usesdoi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac
This paper describes the processing and archive for the ZTF measurements.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74
Astropy supplies UTC-to-TDB time conversion, site coordinates, and barycentric light travel times. The software versions and prepared times are preserved.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe 2018–2025 ZTF flux fits support a period decrease for J0538+1953 with the tested stable profiles
This J0651 study provides a method precedent for public ZTF clock comparisons and midpoint time preparation. Its publication and code were inspected. The code for J0538 was written anew.
- usesHeliocentric times shift the J2130 period derivative by −0.74 × 10⁻¹² s/s in 2018–2025 ZTF fits with stable profiles
We use its earlier-fit/later-data test design for survey clocks. The J2130 code is new. Our later filter/year means are refitted for both clocks.
- A decreasing period improves 2023–2025 ZTF predictions for J2243+5242 with fixed flux profiles
This related study tests later predictions for J0651.
- usesA decreasing period improves 2024–2025 ZTF predictions for J1539 with fixed flux profiles
We use its test design with early fits, later fixed predictions, and residual time blocks. We write new code for J1539.
- Image depth cuts change the 2018–2025 ZTF period fit for J1813+4251 with a fixed primary eclipse shape
This separate study tests a period change in J0651 with survey light curves and block residual simulations. Here we let broad profiles change by year and test image depth. We do not reuse its data or code.