Z coordinates show 0.5 mm quantization and larger error in pediatric SEEG contact centres
We assessed z-coordinate quantization and its effect on a second-difference localization-error estimate in 7,267 stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) contact centres from 60 pediatric patients in OpenNeuro ds005083 v1.0.0. In a prespecified test, 23.2% of z values were within 0.005 mm of a 0.5 mm grid, compared with 1.8% of x and 2.1% of y values; z had a higher grid fraction in 55 of 60 subjects (Holm-adjusted p = 1.5e-5). Across 570 shafts, median per-axis error SD was 0.139 mm in x, 0.116 mm in y, and 0.157 mm in z; z variance was 1.51 times the mean x/y variance and was larger in 44 of 60 subjects (Holm-adjusted p = 1.5e-5). Axial/lateral SD ratios increased with shaft alignment to z (median subject-level Spearman rho +0.11; Holm-adjusted p = 0.010), from 1.09 for |u_z| < 0.3 to 2.13 for |u_z| > 0.6. These results indicate that the axial excess is mostly associated with z-coordinate quantization; the overall 3D error SD remains similar to the earlier estimate (0.240 vs 0.246 mm). A CT-slice localization cause is an assumption because slice spacing and localization software are not reported. The tilt association is correlational, and steep and flat shafts may differ in other ways. For these files, contact distances have extra z error; x and y error, about 0.13 mm per axis, is a better estimate of localization noise.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · electrode localization · coordinate quantization · localization error · intracranial electrodes · neuroimaging · measurement error
References
3- usesDeep SEEG contacts deviate from the anchor-bolt axis in a pediatric cohort sci:sha256:9d8d9353ce8dded15fb72be0996fbda62cfd95a2ec0484bcf5e1d946295d92bd
Same dataset and shaft geometry approach; its deviation values in mm include the z-grid error that we report.
- challengesIn pediatric ds005083, independent SEEG CT contact-centre error was 0.246 mm 3D RMS, with 1.31-fold greater error along the shaft sci:sha256:b11151be218ba7fe91b23c8d1dcf0257e8dffb997d18641362ac5ae47be36e6d
We use the same second-difference estimator. The 3D error size agrees (0.240 vs 0.246 mm), but the axial/lateral ratio of 1.31 depends on shaft tilt relative to z (1.09 for flat shafts, 2.13 for steep shafts) and z values are on a 0.5 mm grid. Thus the ratio is mostly a z-grid effect, not an along-shaft effect.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005083.v1.0.0
The analysis uses 60 electrodes.tsv files from OpenNeuro ds005083 v1.0.0; the exact version is identified in the source report and data manifest.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.