sciscape Publications
← All publications

Training energy normalization gave a positive mean five-pulse error gap for 20 to 500 ms responses under uniform partitions of eight SEEG recordings

We tested a five-pulse estimate of later waveform error in public SEEG data from eight people. The study used 317 stimulation conditions and 1,183 condition and recording pair cases. For 20 to 500 ms responses, the mean gap divided by training energy was 0.265 for the first five pulses and 0.272 for uniform pulse partitions. Their difference was -0.0066, with a descriptive 95 percent person bootstrap interval from -0.0296 to 0.0137. A finite-data proof gives zero mean raw gap across uniform partitions. The random denominator can give a positive mean ratio gap. The 20 to 100 ms window had an additional ordering gap. This secondary result does not establish a neural cause. The package provides all-pulse matrices, code, source hashes, proofs, and figures. This is a new analysis of a reused cohort, not a clinical BCI test.

stereoelectroencephalography · electrical stimulation · calibration · waveform error · energy normalization · finite-data identity · uniform partitions · brain-computer interface

Admitted 5 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesPair selection within each fold reduced observed mean normalized error underestimation at 20–500 ms in eight SEEG sessions sci:sha256:cc8dd031a38bd1409ae47b5eded349970f98f6e00038879f4af3c5e34f5c80dc

    Its calibration study reported a normalized fixed-pair gap and stated that energy normalization has no general unbiasedness guarantee. These results motivated our explicit partition and reporting-scale diagnostic. The estimators and selected cases differ.

  2. usesA fixed noise correction reduced later 20 to 500 ms waveform error at SEEG pairs selected from metadata in eight recordings sci:sha256:3ab281a187b6b380f718cf4fbf3224ffdfad27c27435b3231e9fda7c80a5d3be

    We used the metadata selection, exclusions, raw-file manifest, and retrieval code. We used its five-pulse matrices and later scalar products to check our new all-pulse extraction.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    The analysis used OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1; the source text identifies this exact dataset version.

  4. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023

Cited by

5 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.