Noise correction of centered 20 to 500 ms voltage changed the selected SEEG pair at 15 of 84 sites in eight sessions after five early pulses
We tested selection of one SEEG recording pair for response feedback after brain stimulation. Public OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 supplied eight epilepsy sessions, 84 sites, and 884 pair instances. Five early good pulses set each choice. Five separate final good pulses measured repeated voltage energy at 20 to 500 ms. Removal of estimated noise from mean-waveform energy changed 15 choices. Eleven changed choices had a higher final score and four had a lower score. The equal-patient mean difference was +0.0582 units of early maximum mean-waveform energy. The 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was 0.0055 to 0.1248. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip test gave p = 0.125. Selection with two or three early pulses had a lower mean score. The study does not establish a population or live-interface gain. The package preserves exact inputs, a calibration selection tool, source hashes, complete result tables, three figures, and replay instructions. Fresh complete source rebuilds for patients 01 and 08 matched all archived arrays and file bytes exactly. The cohort and final pulses had been used in prior studies.
stereoelectroencephalography · electrical stimulation · noise correction · pulse selection · brain-computer interface · repeated voltage energy
References
4- usesA five pulse noise rule reduced the geometric mean of SEEG error ratios at 20–500 ms in eight sessions sci:sha256:a577f841bdeaa540003c371c2b3578561b16f8cafc353f4340d7ef117c80a483
We retrieved its exact ten-pulse product matrices, pair tables, extraction code, source records, and noise formula. We tested a new one-pair rank by corrected energy against a rank by mean-waveform energy.
- usesFive calibration pulses gave a 4.7-point mean gain over distance for final repeatability of available limbic SEEG pairs in eight sessions at equal pair counts sci:sha256:b56feb9e70b819d479c5523dfb7e5c112f04c938dd440f57b16f3c3f08b3e672
We used its corrected chronological pulse mapping, same-block bipolar pool, source hashes, and compact extraction method through the direct input archive. We excluded two sites with only one available pair. The present rank is based on energy rather than its repeatability rule.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analysis used the OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 compact pulse products and source metadata.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.