Five calibration pulses gave a 4.7-point mean gain over distance for final repeatability of available limbic SEEG pairs in eight sessions at equal pair counts
We tested five-pulse selection of recording pairs for brain interface feedback. We used public limbic SEEG data from eight epilepsy patient sessions in OpenNeuro ds004696, version 1.0.1. Both calibration and distance selected 463 of 884 available pair instances at 84 sites. The final outcome used separate pulses. It measured the fraction of ten final two-versus-three-pulse partitions with waveform correlation at least 0.8. The mean pass fractions were 46.3 percent for calibration and 41.6 percent for distance. The mean gain was 4.7 percentage points. The 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was 0.4 to 10.1 points. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip test gave p = 0.09375. Five patients had a gain, one had a loss, and two had no change. Generalization is uncertain. The pool depends on retrospective source labels and available source outputs. We preserve a five-pulse tool, exact inputs, code, source hashes, all results, and three figures. One fresh source rebuild matched the inputs. An offline replay matched all 31 output files byte for byte.
SEEG · electrical stimulation · waveform repeatability · pair selection · calibration · limbic system · brain-computer interface · patient bootstrap
References
4- usesA five-pulse check selected more repeatable bipolar SEEG pairs within eight epilepsy patient sessions sci:sha256:b5b7963746f5c6d2a2a8f7844ec590732a4eb152bc7a70979b3bc95c3e27820f
Its compact waveform archive and extraction method supplied the original data derivative through the directly cited source analysis. We preserve its attribution and code license.
- usesThe nearest half of bipolar SEEG pairs outside the stimulated shaft had a higher mean rate of repeatable responses than the random expectation in eight epilepsy sessions sci:sha256:1a26d36b188a95ead0d43f052fc29b919849315f46a2562310a4fc08e2efdae2
We used its corrected exact trial products, contact coordinates, source metadata, and retrieval code. We tested a separate final-pulse outcome.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
Source data and author-derived waveforms from OpenNeuro ds004696, version 1.0.1.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesLate response selection gave a mean SEEG repeatability gain of 0.024 over early selection when half the available pairs were kept in eight sessions
We used its fixed available pair pool and the five-pulse two-versus-three split-repeatability method. Its corrected products are reused through the direct source publication. We compare calibration windows using separate final-pulse outcomes.
- usesA five pulse noise rule reduced the geometric mean of SEEG error ratios at 20–500 ms in eight sessions
This package provided the corrected exact trial products, pair tables, source event metadata, and source retrieval code. We tested all 886 available pairs at 86 sites.
- usesRegion labels gave no clear gain over distance for later SEEG response repeatability in eight held person ridge tests
Provides the earlier local five-pulse selection versus nearest-pair question on the same cohort. This study tests donor-trained region and distance models with a complete person held out.
- usesNoise correction of centered 20 to 500 ms voltage changed the selected SEEG pair at 15 of 84 sites in eight sessions after five early pulses
We used its corrected chronological pulse mapping, same-block bipolar pool, source hashes, and compact extraction method through the direct input archive. We excluded two sites with only one available pair. The present rank is based on energy rather than its repeatability rule.