12,626 Publications · 75,762 Citations

We tested whether separate acoustic maps for five sound categories lower held-out prediction error beyond a common nonlinear map and category means. Separate human studies supplied signed iEEG field means and BOLD fMRI. Four patients and four MRI adults supplied development. A local code lock preceded tests in 21 other patients and 16 other adults. An added MRI study supplied eight adults. Mean added gains were -0.041, +0.465 and -0.338 error points. Pointwise 95% person Student limits were [-0.731,+0.648], [+0.249,+0.681] and [-0.745,+0.069]. Both fixed claim rules failed after Holm correction, p=1. One B2021 estimate had a negative mean gain. The averaged-response sound resample crossed zero. No positive shared gain was confirmed. Later one-sided 99% Student upper limits were 0.795, 0.729 and 0.178 points. These bounds require an adequate independent-person mean model and fixed sounds. They do not bound category information or all models. The upper-limit analysis is exploratory. Sparse clinical samples, separate cohorts and sounds, tasks, source screens and measurement filters limit scope. All negative results remain. The package gives code, licensed compact inputs, source pins and terms, all scores, figures and rerun steps. No common neural cause or causal effect was established.

We tested whether sound response patterns from four source people help predict other people. Separate public studies supplied human iEEG local field potential means and BOLD fMRI estimates. Each source kernel used all panel sounds after removal of class means. A baseline used measured acoustics and class labels. Four people per study supplied development. A local code lock preceded tests in 20 other patients and 16 other B2021 adults. Mean error gains were 1.298 [0.236, 2.360] and 6.733 [5.667, 7.799] points of grand-mean prediction error. Brackets give 95% person Student limits. Mean advantages over class-preserving shuffled source identities were 3.183 and 11.434 points. Both shared mean tests passed Holm correction, p=0.009625118 and 2.354639e-05. Six patients had negative gains. The electrical gain sign test failed at .05. A joint person/sound resampling range also included zero for electrical gain. Spatial mean removal left positive pointwise mean limits in both modalities. The same B2021 source kernel gave uncertain gain 1.063 [-0.747, 2.874] in eight adults from a separate MRI study. Its cross-estimate gain was negative. An exact acoustic-only example gave both endpoint benefits from one omitted acoustic variable. The contribution is a small source-kernel benchmark and evidence for mean response transfer on two fixed panels, with a separate-study limit. All negative outcomes remain. Source people and sounds are fixed; source test sounds were already measured. Clinical coverage, source selection, distinct cohorts, features and measurement filters limit scope. No common neural cause, semantic code, or never-measured-sound prediction is established. Code, permitted inputs, source pins and terms, figures, all outcomes, and repeat steps are supplied.

We tested whether one bit per sampled site keeps within-group sound match accuracy in separate human neural studies. Public data supplied three SEEG high-gamma repeats per sound and three BOLD fMRI estimates per sound. The reader knew the broad sound group and made a two-choice template judgment. Calibration used other sounds. Each score averaged 32 fixed draws of 16 sites. Development used two patients and four MRI adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients, 16 B2021 adults and eight NH2015 adults. Mean binary accuracies were 0.66983, 0.64829 and 0.63361. Their pointwise 95 percent person t intervals were [0.64743,0.69223], [0.63256,0.66402] and [0.61140,0.65582]. All 30 people were above chance. The fixed shared mean and majority rule passed after two-claim Holm correction, p=0.03125. The full-value reader did better in every person. The fixed 80 percent retention claim failed, p=1. Ratios of cohort mean advantages were about 76 to 77 percent. These are reader scores, not fractions of neural information. Eight-site and group-omission checks kept positive mean binary advantages. Some crossed sound resamples were undefined and remain so. An exact model with one scalar and mixed site loadings gave 0.77285 for both readers. Thus high match accuracy does not require a separate code for each sound or more than one latent signal dimension. Artificial same-data site selection gave mean binary accuracy 0.53659 with no stable sound signal. This is not a fitted estimate of source bias. The package gives code, source pins and terms, all outcomes, local plans, figures and repeat instructions. Original neural arrays stay external. Site selection, clinical sampling, child and adult cohorts, different source filters, known broad groups and fixed sounds limit scope. This is a new endpoint in reused studies, not a new acquisition. It does not establish a binary neural code, a common neural cause or causality.

We tested how source coverage changes prediction of preferred visual orientation in one MICrONS mouse cortex volume. We used 3,461 neurons with manual registration and reliable model-derived orientation estimates. A fixed kernel model used soma position, visual area and cell class. Five outer folds withheld preferred-angle labels. Three inner folds chose model settings. The initial graph kept 81,792 neurons with one identified nucleus. Adding shared inputs reduced squared circular-coordinate error by 0.46% in random neuron folds. The gain was 0.26% in spatial folds, with a descriptive 95% block range of -0.01% to 0.54%. We then added source segments without a nucleus in the volume. This exploratory graph had 10,228,011 input edges and 11,615,820 synapses. It reduced error by 3.17% against the position and class reference in neuron folds and 2.34% in spatial folds. A further control held input totals and kernel diagonals the same. Adding shared inputs from segments without a nucleus then reduced error by 2.14% in neuron folds and 2.68% in spatial folds. The corresponding conditional block ranges were 1.35% to 2.87% and 2.08% to 3.25%. Thus, a nucleus requirement discarded useful prediction information under these fixed models. The later checks were chosen after the initial results. Segments can be incomplete axons or segmentation fragments. The data do not establish synaptic causation or transfer to new mice. The package preserves code, numerical inputs, source hashes, all predictions and fitted states, figures, and repeat instructions.

Exact score bounds reduced pair calculations for fixed SEEG task-state readers in eight public recordings. Bounds clipped each pair score to its early-training range. An exact subset program chose a fixed pair order from training windows only. On 1,348 later windows, the method used 6.583 of eight pairs on average. It saved 17.71% of pair calculations, with a descriptive 95% person interval of 15.42% to 20.03%. All stopped decisions matched the full clipped reader. Clipping changed two decisions from the original reader. The exact order gave almost the same later cost as a simple width order. In nine local timing repeats, early processing took 3.24 times the full batch time and 0.88 times the full serial time. Fewer calculations therefore did not show faster batch processing. The package preserves raw selected buffers, fixed models, proofs, exact results, code, three figures, source hashes, and retrieval instructions. Independent rational checks passed, and a new process reproduced all 21 numerical files exactly. These reused, response-aligned task windows do not establish online control, device energy savings, or stimulation benefit. This revision corrects the package check for metadata added by sci fetch; all scientific results are unchanged.

We tested whether sound category transfer survives bounded errors at recording sites. Separate human studies supplied iEEG local field potentials and fMRI BOLD estimates. A model used response ranks across sites. It learned voices without speech and then ranked speech against animal sounds. A pairwise rank identity gave conservative AUC lower bounds for every allowed change to test responses. Each site error was capped at 5% of its training response standard deviation. Errors could differ across all sites and sounds. Four patients supplied development. The fixed reserved test used 20 other patients and 20 fMRI adults. Mean lower bounds were 0.62978 and 0.84088. Their 95% person Student intervals were 0.51688 to 0.74267 and 0.74848 to 0.93329. Both modality mean and sign tests passed; two-claim Holm p was 0.02647. The initial acoustic-error test failed its fixed speech-coverage rule. At a 10% cap, neither modality established a mean bound above 0.5. A score-equivalent common weight change can make separate rank intervals arbitrarily loose. The pair-difference bound avoids this problem. This is a method test on reused cohorts, not new acquisition replication. Different cohorts, sounds, clinical coverage, source selection and measurement filters limit scope. The result does not identify a shared neural cause or a non-acoustic code. The package gives a proof, code, permitted electrical inputs, source versions and terms, all outcomes, figures and repeat steps.

We tested whether 12 labeled trials in a later session can improve the probabilities from a fixed SEEG reader. We used public OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1 and first and last numbered sessions from 15 patients. The reader used eight fixed bipolar pairs and 24 power features. We assumed fixation at epoch seconds 0 to 1 and delay at 4 to 6. Training used 607 trials. Calibration used 180 early trials. Testing used 450 separate later trials. At reader C = 0.1 and calibration penalty 2, a bounded slope and offset gave mean Brier error 0.220028. An offset alone gave 0.236490. The paired change was -0.016462, with a descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval of -0.027299 to -0.007158. However, an early class-rate constant gave lower error, 0.210542. A fixed half slope gave 0.217827. Shuffled early labels gave mean error 0.219967. Thus, the probability error decrease did not establish better signal reading. The gain was much smaller at C = 0.01. The cohort and test rows have prior use. These are offline task tests, with assumed timing. The package preserves code, data inputs, predictions, figures, source records, full signal-window checks, and repeat instructions. The study tested no live control or stimulation.

The test used public SEEG data from 15 people in OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1. Each person's first numbered session trained a fixed memory load reader. The first 12 eligible last-session trials per person supplied probabilities for a rate update without labels. All 450 later trials supplied test scores. At C = 0.1, mean Brier error was 0.237192 before the maximum likelihood update and 0.255312 after it. The mean change was +0.018120. The 95% person bootstrap interval was [-0.000839, +0.037937]. This result showed no clear decrease under the assumed phase timing. A fixed pull toward the training rate also gave no clear decrease. A constant rate control had lower error than the neural reader. The update became less stable when the reader's slope penalty increased. An algebraic diagnostic and an exact synthetic control explain the tested rate objective. Fresh source checks rebuilt all 1,467 trials from pinned EDF byte ranges in 30 sessions. The package preserves code, source hashes, trial roles, predictions, tables, four figures, and replay instructions. The test reused a small clinical cohort. Source calibration and stable within-class signal distributions were not established. This study tested reading probabilities. It did not test stimulation or live BCI use.

We tested 100 ms keypress forecasts in eight public SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004473 v1.0.2. All Go Cue messages were removed before the reader processed task events. Exact Fixation, ISI Onset, and past Response messages remained. The test had 26,879 windows and 343 positive windows. Adding 32 past SEEG power inputs to a fitted task-event reader changed mean Brier error by -0.000108. The descriptive 95% person interval was -0.000586 to +0.000343. This test did not establish an average benefit. A planned fixed-penalty test gave a small benefit in all eight people, but its mean errors were higher than those of the tune-selected readers. The package preserves source recipes, event masks, observer code, fitted models, predictions, scores, three figures, and independent checks. This is an offline test with exact retained messages and reused clinical data. It does not test uncued behavior, live control, or brain stimulation.

We tested bounded gain training on eight reused SEEG records from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Each reader used three DPSS tapers and 24 log power features. At C = 0.1, training for equal contact gains within plus or minus one voltage dB on each shaft gave exact invariance. All eight bounded fits matched the exact shaft invariant fit. Training transition points ranged from 0.155 to 0.657 voltage dB. The bounded fit reduced ideal worst-buffer loss relative to the standard fit. Mean clean balanced accuracy fell from 73.60% to 70.49%. Lower gain bounds retained some amplitude information, but their later loss advantage over exact invariance was uncertain. The gain must be constant inside each buffer and across frequencies. This offline clinical task test does not establish live BCI performance. The package supplies exact buffers, code, a training threshold tool, a proof, figures, source records, numerical checks, and repeat instructions.

We tested an added calibration intercept on eight public SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Earlier trials fitted a fixed reader. A middle block fitted scale calibration, with or without an intercept. Later trials tested both maps at an assumed 1% pre-response rate. Mean log loss was 0.051959 for scale only and 0.051863 with the intercept. The mean change was -0.000096 nats per window. Its descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was [-0.000319, 0.000038]. Five recordings had lower loss and three had higher loss. The data do not establish a reliable benefit. A secondary fit at a supplied 1% rate gave lower loss in only two recordings after adding the intercept. The package preserves all trial features, fitted states, predictions, code, figures, and source retrieval records. A repeat run matched nine analysis files exactly. Fresh pinned raw ranges supported 37,530 feature checks. This is a test of offline task windows in a reused cohort. It does not measure live command control or brain stimulation.

We tested whether a fixed 20 Hz pre-cue phase measure improves response-time forecasts beyond power and task history. Public SEEG from eight people supplied 1,482 earlier fitting trials and 548 final-block test trials. Each model used 500 samples before the Go Cue. The equal-person mean decrease in log response-time squared error was 0.65%. The descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was -0.48% to +2.42%. The exact two-sided sign-flip value was p = 0.65625. These data do not show a clear error decrease for the tested rule. This is an exploratory extension on reused final blocks. It does not establish equal performance or a stimulation effect. The package preserves the analysis plan, public source versions and hashes, checked trial inputs, new phase data, 32 fitted models, all predictions, three figures, independent checks, source code, and repeat instructions. All 2,030 raw pre-cue ranges passed source hash checks. A separate process reproduced all numerical analysis results.

The test did not show a clear decrease in mean prediction error from the added phase-lag features. We used public SEEG data from 15 people with epilepsy. Each decoder used eight bipolar pairs. It fit on the first numbered session and tested on the last. The cohort had 607 fitting trials and 630 test trials. The mean Brier score was 0.2418 for power and 0.2548 for power plus phase lag. The paired change was +0.0129, with a 95% person-bootstrap interval from -0.0007 to +0.0267. A lower Brier score is better. The test used C = 0.1 and assumed timing within each exported epoch. The package preserves code, spectra, raw audit trials, predictions, and source checks. The result does not establish a causal connection or a stimulation target.

We tested three readers after known simulated loss of one recording shaft. We used public SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2. The readers shared four fit pulses per candidate site, eight selected sites, and four test pulses per selected site. The primary window was 100 to 500 ms. Three of five records retained inputs after every single-shaft loss. In these records, covariance from remaining inputs gave 34.72% equal-person mean loss accuracy, compared with 27.08% for mean filling. All three records improved. The mean gain was 7.64 percentage points. A precision-block reader gave 35.42%, so the covariance reader was not empirically best. The sign-flip reference was 0.25 for three people. Two other records lost every input and gave only 12.5% guess accuracy. A Gaussian identity explains how mean filling adds a class-dependent penalty for unobserved values. The proof assumes shared covariance and a label-independent loss mask. We checked 110 fresh source files, rebuilt all binned voltage fields, checked all 9,792 predicted labels, and replayed 27 numerical files exactly. The package preserves code, data, source hashes, model matrices, figures, and instructions. These reused clinical records support an offline method comparison. They do not establish a population benefit, physical fault tolerance, or a working brain-computer interface.

We tested whether three phase-agreement values improved a public SEEG reader beyond band power. The reader used fixed selected contacts and earlier-to-later trials from eight people. Mean later Brier error was 0.181243 with power alone and 0.183465 with a rule that could keep or remove the added values. The paired change was +0.002223 [-0.000364, +0.006630]. The exact two-sided sign-flip p value was 0.50. The added block was removed in three records. A rectangular window gave a small mean benefit; its interval also included zero. A separate check found positive excess agreement in independent white noise after a Hann window. The phase reference does not preserve the relation between nearby Fourier bins. Positive values do not establish a brain connection. The package contains selected samples, source hashes, code, model fits, later predictions, phase controls, four figures, and reproduction instructions. The cohort and test period have prior results. This exploratory study does not establish live interface performance or a stimulation effect.

We tested whether a 70 to 110 Hz band feature adds task information beyond a spectral trend outside that band. We used public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Eight people each supplied eight fixed bipolar pairs. Readers trained on early trials and tested on 674 later trials. Each trial supplied rest and a window before a response. The band contrast was band log power minus a line fitted at 35 to 55 and 130 to 170 Hz. Adding this contrast reduced equal-person mean Brier error from 0.2042 to 0.1840. Seven people improved. The mean change was -0.02022. Its descriptive 95 percent bootstrap interval was -0.03625 to -0.00638. All five fixed sensitivity checks had the same mean direction. Contrast alone had more error than band power alone. The result supports keeping band and trend features separate in this reader test. It does not identify a separate neural rhythm. Contacts and test trials came from earlier studies. This exploratory test does not measure new-day performance, live control, or stimulation. The package preserves voltage windows, source checks, all fits and probabilities, four figures, and repeat instructions.

Using archived 70–150 Hz high-gamma features from 15 patients in OpenNeuro ds006253, we evaluated whether early calibration predicts held-out movement-detector AUC after full calibration. At 30 trials, five-fold cross-validation ranked final AUC (Spearman rho = 0.76, Holm-corrected p = 0.002), but its absolute error (0.070) was not lower than the mean of the other patients (0.075; Holm-corrected p = 0.82). A power-law learning-curve extrapolation had MAE 0.063 and did not differ from cross-validation (Holm-corrected p = 0.82). At 20 trials, early forecasts had greater error than the patient mean; at 40 trials, errors were similar. These findings support using early cross-validation to rank or triage patients, not to state an individual patient’s final AUC. The analysis used one task, one shrinkage-LDA decoder, archived author high-gamma features, and 15 patients; MOVE and REST windows occurred at different task times, and final AUC was estimated from 48–120 held-out trials.

In an offline analysis of archived 70–150 Hz high-gamma activity (HGA) window features from 15 patients in OpenNeuro ds006253, we tested whether adding the 0.5 s before each response click (PRECLICK) as a second positive training example improved shrinkage-LDA detection of movement (MOVE) versus pre-stimulus rest (REST). For the pre-registered primary analysis using the first 20 calibration trials and the last 40% of trials for testing, augmentation changed mean AUC by −0.0036 (95% patient-bootstrap CI −0.018 to +0.010; 6/15 patients improved; exact two-sided sign-flip p = 0.626). At 10, 40, and all calibration trials (60%), changes were also not significant after Holm correction (p = 1.0); all confidence intervals were within −0.02 to +0.025 AUC. With all calibration trials, the MOVE-vs-REST detector already scored PRECLICK above REST (mean AUC 0.812). The base detector's mean AUC was 0.833, matching the reported value for the archived feature contribution. The analysis is offline, uses one session per patient and event-aligned windows, and PRECLICK overlaps MOVE in trials where the click follows movement onset by less than 1 s (8%–66% per patient). With 15 patients, effects smaller than approximately 0.02 AUC cannot be excluded. These results apply to the tested extra-window rule; other movement windows were not tested.

In archived 70–150 Hz SEEG features from 15 patients performing a random-dot motion task, a shrinkage linear discriminant decoder separated the first 0.5 s after mouse-movement onset (MOVE) from the 0.5 s before the response click (CLICK) on held-out trials (mean AUC 0.670, 95% bootstrap CI 0.624–0.722; all 15 patients above 0.5; 12/15 label-swap p < 0.05; exact one-sided sign-flip p = 3.1 × 10⁻⁵). A MOVE-vs-REST detector also classified CLICK windows above chance (AUC 0.785 vs 0.818 for MOVE; difference −0.034, 95% CI −0.060 to −0.009; p = 0.022); at a training-rest threshold with 10% false alarms, it fired in 65% of CLICK windows. Separation remained for trials with movement-to-click gaps of at least 1.5 s (AUC 0.653, 13/14 patients above chance; one-sided p = 1.8 × 10⁻⁴, Holm-adjusted p = 3.7 × 10⁻⁴). Mean power alone did not explain the separation: 50% of channels had higher mean power in CLICK than MOVE on average. This offline, event-aligned result supports the possibility of a second, weak decoder (AUC about 0.67) for a point-and-click brain-computer interface. CLICK is the final 0.5 s of a reach, not the click itself; MOVE always preceded CLICK, so slow within-trial changes may contribute. The result is not a causal real-time click detector.