At 24 sites, one repeat mode lowered error in six SEEG patients and two fMRI panels; a zero residual pattern gave lower error
We tested removal of one repeat-variation mode from human sound responses. Separate public studies supplied SEEG high-gamma activity and two BOLD fMRI panels. Each person supplied 24 sites and three response repeats. Different sounds set the mode and measured its error. Class means and spatial means were removed. Development used two patients and four MRI adults. A local code lock preceded tests in six other patients, 16 B2021 adults and eight NH2015 adults. Mean error reductions were 8.91, 12.12 and 11.13 points of raw test response variance. Added reductions over a uniform random direction were 6.50, 9.83 and 8.69 points. All 30 people had both gains. The shared rule passed Holm correction over three claims, p=0.046875. The original claims of excess signal loss and harmful removal failed. Sound and person refits assess panel sensitivity. A later exploratory check found lower error from a zero residual pattern in every person. A pre-onset SEEG check also gave a removal benefit. Thus the fixed gain does not show useful sound decoding or a sound-specific neural process. Independent-source models can give signal loss and either error benefit or harm after common measurement mixing. Separate cohorts, source selection, three repeats, unequal filters and fixed sounds limit scope. Code, source pins and terms, all failures, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Original neural arrays remain external. No common neural cause or causal effect was established.
human neuroscience · SEEG · fMRI · auditory cortex · repeat variation · denoising · cross-validation · negative results
References
12- usesMaps of sound tuning and repeat variation were positively related at 24 selected sites per record in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies sci:sha256:470fe9a3793652ea5dbbfee38bddf515d2659ed52d74a5b9f4ece9f1af74b4d7
We adapt its credited source readers and pins. Its tuning-variation result motivates the distinct held-out mode-removal test.
- supportsA fixed covariance model predicted repeat change directions across sound groups in selected SEEG and fMRI records sci:sha256:3366f9aa4f3f1193aa902c5e8fa356e34a4f667aa10e236a5a311cd8059b3b51
Related evidence for structured measured repeat changes. The present error projection is a different endpoint.
- At 16 sites, template noise subtraction reduced sound identity accuracy in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:f502ddb8c426c1c34c00ac35a21f137cd025a8827da4cc4d75d46ccea478e028
- usesKeeping site labels improved repeated sound assignment after mean, size and global sign removal in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:3de43695aee9eba4e9670d283d540979dc41511aa5e3443dfcc5d67325a68e7f
Inherited source-reader code and pins, with preserved MIT notices.
- usesRelations to other sound classes supported matching between 32 fixed iEEG profiles and fMRI in 28 adults sci:sha256:14255acab6420eb07438ce9cbe58592761d615ecb583e7116b44c8571bab4d8a
Inherited source-format and pin credit.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0156-16.2016
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012092
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- For 128 fixed sounds, scales from repeat differences gave higher mean matching AUC than variance scales in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Its zero-pattern comparator motivated an identity readout rather than response error alone.
- usesEight learned sound response directions failed a shared gain test in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
Its zero-residual comparison motivates the stronger prediction baselines.