Relations to other sound classes supported matching between 32 fixed iEEG profiles and fMRI in 28 adults
We tested whether response relations to other sound classes support fine sound matching. A fixed panel of 32 distinct source-selected intracranial profiles and two separate fMRI studies supplied responses to 165 clips. Targets came from ten classes with at least five clips. Other classes supplied all anchors. Class means were removed. Same-class candidate ranks were averaged over 158 targets. In 20 B2021 and eight NH2015 adults, mean AUC was 0.7112 and 0.6569, with 95% person limits [0.6985,0.7238] and [0.6372,0.6765]. All 28 scores were above chance. The shared rule passed, Holm p=0.00781250. A later fixed repeat test in eight identified SEEG patients passed, mean AUC 0.7159, 95% person limits [0.6870, 0.7448], Holm p=0.00781250. MRI repeat checks remained descriptive. The electrical reference lacks patient labels, so cross-study uncertainty conditions on that panel. The separate repeat test does not repair that population limit. Acoustic references had higher cohort mean ranks. An unfitted rank-one gain model also scored above chance. Exploratory removal of one or three anchor modes kept positive scores in all MRI people. Thus matching does not establish a semantic code, unique item codes, neural rank or a cause. The package preserves code, source pins and rights, local plans, all results, uncertainty, figures and repeat steps. Original neural arrays remain external.
human neuroscience · intracranial EEG · SEEG · fMRI · sound matching · representational similarity · public data · replication
References
12- usesResidual sound maps agreed between a fixed iEEG panel and 20 fMRI adults under a rotation reference sci:sha256:c833e2811606e931c209b9a349ce18fad053c6a5d3d1e78c89d2e3e2cb2a83e9
We reuse its verified source manifest and credited input and fetch code; we test retrieval rather than residual map correlation.
- usesIn 15 adults, 24 reference images supported within-class matching of 68 other images between MEG and fMRI sci:sha256:f18d20c48e7a6f3575db4f51a9119f388f153889882efb2622461b05ac888089
Its visual landmark benchmark informed the distinct auditory test with only other-class anchors. No code or neural data are copied.
- usesA repeat difference metric improved matching of 165 sounds in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:980d42dfb364faf26f60b98bf74a18d48bbbac309b59e3cf8f482465aca31c77
Its verified SEEG source manifest supports the new patient-labelled repeat extension; its direct-distance endpoint differs.
- doi:10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.035
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349726
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
Cited by
9 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAt 24 sites, one repeat mode lowered error in six SEEG patients and two fMRI panels; a zero residual pattern gave lower error
Inherited source-format and pin credit.
- usesA fixed rank test did not confirm shared sound map identity matching across different sites in eight SEEG patients and 28 fMRI adults
Its sound-relation representation and identified SEEG data provenance informed the study.
- usesKeeping site labels improved repeated sound assignment after mean, size and global sign removal in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults
We reuse credited exact source pins and source-format reader ideas; its matching results inform the question.
- usesMaps of sound tuning and repeat variation were positively related at 24 selected sites per record in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies
Source pins and format work inherited through SCI 440091bf.
- usesFixed sound dictionaries gave mean expected random label accuracy above chance in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies
Sound relationships as shared coordinates for records with different measurement sites; also establishes the unverified Rupp clip join limit.
- A repeat area test gave positive means for nine vocal sounds in eight SEEG patients and two fMRI cohorts
Its sound matching result and exact one-gain caveat motivated a direct rank-one response test.
- usesAtlas forecasts lowered error for fixed sounds in SEEG and fMRI; an added SEEG baseline control gave no clear gain
Original source-pin provenance credited by the inherited MIT readers.
- usesFixed action and object label products failed a shared test of higher error in five EEG and eight fMRI adults for 102 videos
Its exact one-gain example informed our interpretation check. We reuse no neural arrays or code.
- A fixed class relation rule failed a shared gain test in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults
Relational sound prediction motivates the question. No data or code from that assay are used.