sciscape Publications
← All publications

Relations to other sound classes supported matching between 32 fixed iEEG profiles and fMRI in 28 adults

We tested whether response relations to other sound classes support fine sound matching. A fixed panel of 32 distinct source-selected intracranial profiles and two separate fMRI studies supplied responses to 165 clips. Targets came from ten classes with at least five clips. Other classes supplied all anchors. Class means were removed. Same-class candidate ranks were averaged over 158 targets. In 20 B2021 and eight NH2015 adults, mean AUC was 0.7112 and 0.6569, with 95% person limits [0.6985,0.7238] and [0.6372,0.6765]. All 28 scores were above chance. The shared rule passed, Holm p=0.00781250. A later fixed repeat test in eight identified SEEG patients passed, mean AUC 0.7159, 95% person limits [0.6870, 0.7448], Holm p=0.00781250. MRI repeat checks remained descriptive. The electrical reference lacks patient labels, so cross-study uncertainty conditions on that panel. The separate repeat test does not repair that population limit. Acoustic references had higher cohort mean ranks. An unfitted rank-one gain model also scored above chance. Exploratory removal of one or three anchor modes kept positive scores in all MRI people. Thus matching does not establish a semantic code, unique item codes, neural rank or a cause. The package preserves code, source pins and rights, local plans, all results, uncertainty, figures and repeat steps. Original neural arrays remain external.

human neuroscience · intracranial EEG · SEEG · fMRI · sound matching · representational similarity · public data · replication

Admitted 9 citing publications

References

12
  1. usesResidual sound maps agreed between a fixed iEEG panel and 20 fMRI adults under a rotation reference sci:sha256:c833e2811606e931c209b9a349ce18fad053c6a5d3d1e78c89d2e3e2cb2a83e9

    We reuse its verified source manifest and credited input and fetch code; we test retrieval rather than residual map correlation.

  2. usesIn 15 adults, 24 reference images supported within-class matching of 68 other images between MEG and fMRI sci:sha256:f18d20c48e7a6f3575db4f51a9119f388f153889882efb2622461b05ac888089

    Its visual landmark benchmark informed the distinct auditory test with only other-class anchors. No code or neural data are copied.

  3. usesA repeat difference metric improved matching of 165 sounds in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:980d42dfb364faf26f60b98bf74a18d48bbbac309b59e3cf8f482465aca31c77

    Its verified SEEG source manifest supports the new patient-labelled repeat extension; its direct-distance endpoint differs.

  4. doi:10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008
  5. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.035
  6. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
  7. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069
  8. doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
  9. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
  10. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349726
  11. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
  12. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488

Cited by

9 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.