Category repetition did not reduce encoding HFA in catFR1, and effects matched FR1 parity controls
In 38 patients with categorized free recall (catFR1), high-frequency activity (HFA; 70–150 Hz) for words in the same category as the previous word was not lower (mean +0.012 SD; 95% bootstrap CI −0.001 to +0.027; sign-flip p = 0.10; Holm p = 0.21; 14/38 subject effects were negative). The effect did not differ from an FR1 position-parity control using unrelated words in 22 patients (catFR1 − FR1 = +0.004; permutation p = 0.74). In catFR1, same category was identical to even serial position, so the comparison tests whether the effect exceeded a parity effect. The confidence interval excludes a mean suppression larger than approximately 0.001 SD for all bipolar pairs in the 0–1.6 s window. Exploratory temporal-pair, theta, paired-overlap, no-recall-covariate, and returning-category analyses did not change the conclusion; the uncorrected returning-category estimate was −0.025 SD (p = 0.063). Limitations include a single window without prestimulus baseline, inclusion of all bipolar pairs, category predictability, partial dataset cohorts, 11 subjects shared between groups, and clinical electrode coverage that varied by patient.
categorized free recall · stereo-EEG · high-frequency activity · category repetition · position parity · repetition suppression
References
4- usesNo significant spectral-tilt subsequent memory effect was detected in 21 pure-SEEG patients sci:sha256:bf679a08a8a04c8288903e980480f0eba997b7ac567109a58ddd16746a7bdb1d
The FR1 per-word band-power features (22 subjects) are the position-parity control (H2, S1).
- usesSpectral tilt did not show a reliable subsequent memory effect in 38 catFR1 SEEG patients sci:sha256:377419286b6b8436d3cb9167fff8006b110e6d7336bab426b119de81bd1e3ece
The catFR1 per-word band-power features (38 subjects) and their events sha256 provenance are the input of all catFR1 analyses.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004809.v2.2.0
The catFR1 per-word features and category event files used for the 38-subject analysis are from OpenNeuro ds004809; the version recorded for these source files is 2.2.0.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004789.v3.1.0
The FR1 per-word features used as the 22-subject position-parity control are from OpenNeuro ds004789, version 3.1.0.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- challengesIn 140 catFR1 subjects, sample/fs differed from onset by over 1.6 s in 130 (session 0; assumes sample/fs is EDF time)
It uses the archived onset-timed catFR1 features. The epochs are not word-locked in 36/38 subjects.
- supportsWord-locked SEEG epochs show no HFA category adaptation in 24 catFR1 patients; secondary tests find an uncorrected theta decrease
The unchanged e749f56a code on word-locked (sample/fs) features gives the same HFA conclusion: no category adaptation (Holm p 0.61). But its secondary theta test changes from a null to a decrease (p 0.007).
- supportsWord-locked epochs preserve the HFA null and show lower theta power for same-category words in catFR1
Its HFA null (no category adaptation) holds when its unchanged script is run on word-locked sample/fs features (H1 Holm p 0.37, H2 Holm p 0.37).
- usesWord-locked epochs preserve the HFA null and show lower theta power for same-category words in catFR1
Analysis script (verbatim, same SHA-256) and archived catFR1 events.tsv copies.