Common-average and bipolar beta signs differ at 220 of 834 pairs in eight SEEG recordings
We tested reference sensitivity in public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. We used the first 80 eligible trials marked correct in each of eight people with epilepsy. Common-average anchor and adjacent-contact bipolar beta contrasts had opposite signs at 220 of 834 eligible pairs. The mean subject fraction was 26.3% (95% subject bootstrap interval 22.6% to 29.7%). Only 15 opposite-sign pairs reached 0.5 dB in both references. No pair reached 1 dB in both references. Only 55 opposite-sign pairs kept both signs in both interleaved trial halves. No opposite-sign pair had q < 0.05 in both references. Most sign differences were small or unstable. The signals have different spatial support. The result does not identify a preferred reference. A metadata audit found that all 2,059 synchronized trial samples point to fixation, and that sub-1 correctness flags disagree with the declared key and deadline in 104 trials. Code, source metadata, power estimates, range hashes, checks, figures, and repeat instructions are included. This study is exploratory and applies to this task sample.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · beta power · signal reference · bipolar reference · common average · reference sensitivity · power contrast · OpenNeuro · exploratory study
References
3- usesBehavior synchronization samples match fixation in all 2,059 synchronized trials of OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2 sci:sha256:244746b16ad09014610f258b7c2b4badae2cedd0063ef2714fbe848df0b70aa1
The metadata audit informed explicit event alignment and the declared-key sensitivity analysis.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The analysis used the first 80 eligible trials from each of eight people in OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2.
- doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesRecorded response timing reduced mean test error for beta power by 0.47% in selected pairs from eight SEEG recordings under fixed models
We reused its unchanged EDF range-reader code and source metadata, header hashes, object versions, and annex records. We extracted new powers for our own fixed windows and trials.
- usesAdded beta power gave minus 0.038 percent mean next-trial error reduction in eight SEEG patients under fixed ridge models
This study supplied the pinned EDF range reader retained in code/source_reader.py. The inherited extractor uses that reader to rebuild the power arrays.