Added beta power gave minus 0.038 percent mean next-trial error reduction in eight SEEG patients under fixed ridge models
We tested whether beta power after a button response improves prediction of the next trial's reaction time. We used public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2 and eight patients with clinical SEEG implants. We reused 1,875 retained trials and formed 1,720 consecutive observed transitions. Earlier trials trained separate patient and condition ridge models at penalty 10. The primary test used 604 later transitions from 13 valid fits. Training selected the 10 percent of pairs with the largest mean response beta decrease. The base model used context, previous reaction time, and previous baseline and response beta levels. The full model added beta power centered about 0.8 seconds after the prior response. The target was natural log next reaction time in seconds. The mean patient error reduction was -0.038 percent. The patient bootstrap 95 percent interval was -1.040 to 0.955 percent. The exact two-sided sign-flip p value was 0.859375. Five of eight patients had positive gains. The interval assumes independent patient sampling. The test also assumes symmetric null gains. The primary test did not show a clear added gain under the fixed models. It does not prove equal models or absent beta function. The next cue was 4.812 to 9.216 seconds after the prior response. This study does not test a second movement during the same high-beta state. Independent regression and leakage checks passed. A second analysis matched all nine numerical output files. Fresh pinned EDF spans checked 31,236 power values in eight test-source trials. All 89 saved metadata files matched the fixed public source commit. The package preserves code, source records, derived powers, transition features, predictions, results, and reproduction instructions.
beta power · reaction time · stereoelectroencephalography · ridge regression · cross-trial prediction · motor behavior
References
8- usesCommon-average and bipolar beta signs differ at 220 of 834 pairs in eight SEEG recordings sci:sha256:0d33b787e33457a21064797883180e8438973f90bf4411bf6f2bb853485c40e2
This study supplied the pinned EDF range reader retained in code/source_reader.py. The inherited extractor uses that reader to rebuild the power arrays.
- usesBeta power before the go cue did not improve later ridge RT prediction beyond context in eight ds004473 patients sci:sha256:927bf76dc811d2b7d2b1c7d550e57b14c625b010d9a5717449065c390cc928d3
This earlier current-trial prediction study informed the context comparison and later test trials. Our study uses prior-response power and a different conditional comparison. It uses no numerical result from that study.
- usesRecorded response timing reduced mean test error for beta power by 0.47% in selected pairs from eight SEEG recordings under fixed models sci:sha256:564168497923de18bfa1d5a9d68a4f9aba3152da63efc3e8fd57f05df7d2f53a
This study supplied the unchanged 38-window beta powers, trial and pair audits, source metadata, extractor, and range ledgers. We used them to test the next trial reaction time.
- usesBehavior synchronization samples match fixation in all 2,059 synchronized trials of OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2 sci:sha256:244746b16ad09014610f258b7c2b4badae2cedd0063ef2714fbe848df0b70aa1
This timing and key audit identified the Fixation sample field and the sub-1 correctness conflict. Its rules support sample reaction times and reconstruction of the previous error.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The study analyzed OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2; the DOI and CC0 license are recorded in the exact-version dataset metadata.
- supportsdoi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
The cited task paper is the source for the statement that this task showed distributed movement-related neural patterns.
- doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01717
- doi:10.1038/ncomms13098
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.