sciscape Publications
← All publications

Kepler DR25 supplemental fits give median radius-ratio errors of +4.1% at input b<0.5 and −10.2% at b≥0.8 in selected recoveries with measured MES 7.1–10

This study tests radius-ratio errors in weak Kepler transits. It uses the public DR25 INJ1 pixel injection table. A local plan was recorded before the first summaries. The primary sample has 32,221 detected, on-target signals with supplemental fits. It requires period agreement within 0.1%, source N_Transit at least 4, and positive radius ratios. Input periods are 0.5–500 days. Input durations are 1.5–15 hours. Input impact parameter b is from 0 to 1. Error is the fitted radius ratio divided by its input value, minus one. At measured multiple event statistic (MES) from 7.1 to below 10, the 15,692 selected signals have a median error of +0.96%. The median is +4.08% for input b<0.5 and −10.16% for b≥0.8. Errors below −20% occur in 10/8,399 signals (0.12%) in the first group and 361/2,070 (17.44%) in the second group. Input b measures transit distance from the star center in stellar radii. Of 933 selected recoveries with expected MES below 7.1, 234 have errors above +20%. None have errors below −20%. These results depend on detection and sample selection. They do not establish a new pipeline fault or a general correction for planet sizes. The main provenance cut excludes the known original fit fault. The package preserves source bytes, all input rows, an error map, code, figures, audits, and repeat-run instructions. The contribution tests conditional errors in supplemental point estimates. It does not test KOI posterior samples or report a new planet.

Kepler DR25 · transit injection · planet radius · impact parameter · selection effects · reproducible research

Admitted 3 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesdoi:10.26133/NEA14

    This study uses the public Kepler DR25 INJ1 pixel injection table. The exact file and source hashes are preserved.

  2. usesdoi:10.26133/NEA34

    Section 7 documents the known original fit fault and the supplemental fits. The main analysis requires supplemental fit provenance.

  3. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abab0b

    This paper describes the Kepler DR25 pixel injection experiment and its detection efficiency.

  4. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9

    Section 2.4 distinguishes original DV fits, supplemental fits, and the fits used for KOI parameters.

  5. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac7f2f

    This paper gives context for radius and impact parameter errors under different transit model choices.

  6. usesKepler DR25 injections with durations below 1.5 hours have lower recovery in 129 matched pairs at expected MES 6–20 sci:sha256:fdb3b4b00a5a5f694a3c0613805cb7123a298e0fbbbe31b7147a2740776d47ce

    This prior study led the investigation to INJ1 and the undefined recovery flag 2. Its preserved source hash agrees with a fresh download. The present analysis code was written separately.

Cited by

3 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.