sciscape Publications
← All publications

Sex explains little of patient-level SEEG spectral variation in 255 RAM patients; peak-frequency evidence is inconclusive

We tested whether sex explains patient-level variation in the 4–13 Hz SEEG peak and five other bipolar spectral features in 255 RAM epilepsy patients (131 women, 124 men). We analyzed archived tables from ds004789 and ds004809, adjusted features for age, sampling rate, dataset and site, and used 10,000 within-site sex permutations and 2,000 patient bootstraps. The peak was 0.29 Hz higher in women (95% CI 0.04–0.55; p=0.020; Holm p=0.12). No test survived Holm correction, and the peak interval does not exclude a difference of 0.3 Hz; this result is inconclusive. Relative theta, relative beta and aperiodic exponent had nominal differences, each no larger than 0.3 SD. Relative alpha and broadband power showed no difference; for broadband power the estimate was +0.03 SD (95% CI −0.23 to +0.26). In a replication cohort of 44 new patients, the peak difference was +0.09 Hz (95% CI −0.60 to +0.94; p=0.82). This replication is too imprecise to confirm or reject the discovery estimate. The cohorts were clinical epilepsy patients; sex came from binary F/M participant metadata, and disease, medication and implant strategy could confound the results. The replication used subject-level location covariates, and only 44 of 57 new people had coordinates.

SEEG · spectral features · sex differences · epilepsy · peak frequency · replication

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesIn 171 SEEG patients, location-adjusted 4–13 Hz peak frequency correlated across hemispheres (r = 0.44, 95% CI 0.26–0.62; RAM FR1/catFR1, one 60 s task segment) sci:sha256:a1b7ac3c9e2dda070b9c8671ac70d99da481fff7d0774b34cbbc5e25638d26dc

    We use its per-pair location-adjusted 4-13 Hz peak table (pair_peaks.tsv).

  2. usesSEEG pairs from one patient share spectral similarity across distances, including 40 mm or more sci:sha256:e3b03621910cb98055ae57b12626884d32ca96353e28a0c54ede9326820873ed

    We use its per-pair spectral feature table and its subject table.

  3. supportsIn 256 RAM SEEG patients, known covariates explain at most 8% of the reliable patient-level spectral component sci:sha256:23a9480c96473ffd4b4eb50fe165b8ccdbc28a5a24ba010e097850a1aa5d2896

    A dedicated sex test with permutation inside site agrees that sex explains little of the patient-level component (all effects 0.3 SD or less, none after Holm), and adds the peak frequency.

  4. usesIn 57 new RAM patients, alpha peak height and relative power increased with age sci:sha256:f8e256317242c5a4b984dcd71ba157c36e785dcc5b4414d7b891af21253cc0ad

    We use its subject values of 57 new RAM persons as the replication cohort.

  5. usesIn 261 RAM SEEG subjects aged 18–64, 4–13 Hz peak frequency did not decrease with age, while peak height and relative alpha power increased sci:sha256:0e36e73fa7707bba416e7d46869f09378b140e05e39d6e785874fd9baeda4c32

    We use its subject median peaks of the discovery cohort for the like-with-like replication model.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.