After regional mean regression, hippocampal boundary patterns did not pass a shared test in single-neuron records from 18 patients and fMRI from 15 adults
We tested whether hippocampal response patterns at film event boundaries repeat from early to late film sections. Separate public human studies supplied intracranial single-neuron spikes and fMRI. Seven patients supplied development. We then tested 18 other patients and 15 fMRI adults. Regional mean regression and film controls preceded each spatial comparison. Mean cosines above shared time-shift references were +0.2279 and +0.0865. Their 95% person intervals were +0.0473 to +0.4077 and +0.0152 to +0.1623. When the bootstrap also varied common film blocks, the intervals crossed zero: -0.1008 to +0.3859 and -0.0185 to +0.1363. Scores were positive in 13/18 and 11/15 people. The fixed shared rule failed; its intersection p was 0.059235, and both block interval gates failed. A later spike window gave a negative mean. Omitting regional mean regression changed the study means in opposite directions. One common source with measurement noise also gave repeatable patterns after regional mean regression. Thus this test would not identify several neural sources. This was a test of a new outcome in reused cohorts and two fixed films. It was not confirmation in new cohorts. Cohort differences, sparse electrical sampling, vascular effects, source cleaning and stationarity assumptions limit scope. No positive cross-modal neural or causal claim is made. The package preserves code, compact inputs, all outcomes, source pins and terms, plans, figures and repeat steps. All 33 reserved person scores passed separate arithmetic checks. A primary replay matched exactly.
human hippocampus · event boundaries · single neurons · fMRI · cross-modal testing · regional mean regression · film sampling · negative result
References
13- usesPast event length did not pass a shared hippocampal test across two films in 18 patients with spikes and 15 fMRI adults sci:sha256:db41691ad0b8075ae267f287a10cd815bc56967bafadf13b61f72fbb017bb66e
We reuse the source route, four MIT utility files and boundary tables. Its regional duration test left spatial response patterns untested. We test a new endpoint in the same cohorts.
- usesdoi:10.48324/dandi.001616/0.260702.0824
Exact public human single-neuron data release.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41597-026-07955-0
SUMMER recording, anatomical labels and film annotations.
- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2016.92
Original StudyForrest audiovisual fMRI cohort and acquisition.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000113.v1.3.0
Original raw metadata release; raw image headers audit run lengths. Main neural input is the separately pinned public derivative.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41597-019-0303-3
Reported manual ICA denoising lineage of the fMRI source.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds001769.v1.2.2
Reported source version for denoised StudyForrest data, upstream of the pinned hippocampal derivative.
- usesdoi:10.64898/2026.04.14.718575
Public hippocampal derivative and observer-boundary tables; exact repository commit and input hashes are preserved.
- usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0524-18.2018
Source of observer-boundary labels; prior evidence on hippocampal boundary responses motivates the new spatial test.
- doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01020-w
- doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38576-5
- usesdoi:10.12688/f1000research.9536.1
Film cuts, depicted locations and time-change annotations for controls.
- supportsdoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036
Established mean-regression interpretation concern; we apply partial-regression algebra to the task-pattern endpoint.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA fixed test did not confirm two consistent hippocampal boundary response directions in 15 patients with spikes and 12 fMRI adults
We reuse its MRI source route, two MIT utility files and CC BY observer tables. Its mean-regression counterexample motivates a different spatial test.
- usesTwo fixed tests did not confirm a shared rise in hippocampal change energy at film boundaries in 11 iEEG patients and ten fMRI adults
Its failed response-direction repeat test motivates a distinct per-event energy test and explicit interpretation limits. Its MRI cohort is reused, not independent confirmation.