A fixed SEEG shape rule gave 15.6 percent stimulation pair accuracy after pulses and 4.5 percent before pulses in five single runs
We tested whether normalized SEEG waveform shape identifies an electrical stimulation pair on later pulses. We used public OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2. The sample had five patients, one run per patient, and eight fixed receiving contacts per patient. Each contact had 20 to 37 candidate pairs. The rule used the first five pulses to form signed unit templates. It classified the last five pulses without a parameter search. Mean accuracy was 15.58 percent from 50 to 250 ms after pulses and 4.50 percent before pulses. The equal-patient difference was 11.08 percentage points. Its descriptive 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was 7.84 to 13.99 points. Each patient had a positive difference. Candidates on one shaft gave 42.51 percent accuracy after pulses and 29.33 percent before pulses. The later window check also gave a positive difference in each patient. Most predictions were incorrect. The result applies to these stimulation blocks. Recording time, patient state, and stable artifacts can contribute. It does not establish neural connections or transfer to another session. The package preserves input data, all scores and predictions, code, source hashes, and reproduction instructions. A raw-file rebuild matched every input array. A second numeric run produced identical result files.
stereoelectroencephalography · electrical stimulation · waveform shape · classification · human intracranial recordings
References
4- usesSEEG pairs selected with five pulses had a mean rank AUC of 0.961 on five unused pulses in five patients sci:sha256:4cb93b4374dae5c9400231a8d61957259ba179017f9913a484a8b6e0c47edd96
This study uses its five archived pulse-window files, metadata, and fixed contact selection. It adds stimulation pair prediction from signed normalized waveform shape. The source study tested stable response-strength ranks.
- Four shared pulses increased correlation between five pulse SEEG averages in five patients sci:sha256:b32094dc7392cb00836046de174e97c74b5e22bff748e10cb681317ecbf47b6d
[Legacy relation: reproduces] This study retains its initial window extraction and retrieval code through the direct input publication. It retrieved all 120 pinned raw files and rebuilt all five window files. Every array matched, including all 3,477,760 voltage values.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2
The analysis uses the archived SEEG data from this exact OpenNeuro release.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesSeparate pulse groups gave larger SEEG waveform distances after stimulation in five patients with one run each
We used its within-run site-recognition question and its time-block limitation to define the new scope. This study measures signed squared distance with waveform size retained. It uses disjoint sites on one shaft and a receiving contact on another shaft. It does not reproduce normalized-template classification or add a new patient cohort.