ZTF DR24 shows fewer deep dimming nights at ZTF J0139+5245 in 2022–2025 than in 2018–2021
We tested whether deep dimming was less frequent in the later public ZTF record of the white dwarf ZTF J0139+5245. We froze two ZTF DR24 light-curve responses and checked that all 1,806 g- and r-band target rows agree. After quality cuts, 1,687 exposures give 738 nightly values from 31 May 2018 through 3 October 2025. We normalized each field and filter by its median magnitude. A deep night has at least 20% less relative flux and passes a three-error rule with an adopted 0.03 mag exposure error floor. There are 16 deep nights among 477 sampled nights in 2018–2021 and none among 261 in 2022–2025. With equal phase weights, the early and late fractions are 3.51% and 0.00% at an assumed period of 104 days, or 3.04% and 0.00% at 107.2 days. The target has a usable value on all 477 early nights and 261 of 262 late nights sampled by the nearest bright control star. Assigning the one wholly missing late target night a deep label gives at most 1/262, or 0.38%, on that control-night set. This bound does not cover gaps or missing exposures within a retained night. Separate filters, image-depth cuts, and warning-flag diagnostics preserve the decrease. Subtracting nearby-star variations gives one late deep night. The choices were made after data inspection. Deep nights in one event are related. The result describes sampled nights and does not establish an event rate, loss of all transits, or an orbit change. The package includes source queries, frozen data, code, numerical results, and figures.
white dwarf · planetary debris · ZTF J0139+5245 · ZTF DR24 · transits · public data · reproducible research
References
6- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9649
This discovery paper identifies the target, its debris transits, and the nominal 107.2-day interval used in a phase-coverage check.
- usesdoi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac
We use public ZTF catalog light curves produced by the survey data system described in this paper.
- usesdoi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe
This paper describes the survey that obtained the source measurements.
- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940
We use Gaia DR3 positions and source identifiers to check the target and nearby comparison stars.
- usesdoi:10.26131/IRSA539
We use metadata for the public ZTF science-image product as an additional inventory. We do not infer flux from images without catalog measurements.
- doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfecb
This paper reports variable debris transits at a different white dwarf and lists the target among known debris transit systems. It gives context for the limited novelty of a new quantitative DR24 comparison.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Under stated Gaussian errors, 2022–2025 ZTF data limit 25-day triangular eclipses with at least 45% peak loss to 7 of 12 tested J0139+5245 cycles
Prior count of deep sampled nights and tests of the later quiet record.
- Retained 2022–2025 ZTF samples of J0139+5245 have phase gaps below 3 days for fixed periods of 100–110 days
This earlier study reports fewer deep nights in the same DR24 record. It defines prior work; our later brightness counts are not a first report.
- usesZTF DR24 records deep dimming at ZTF J1944+4557 on 1 and 8 August 2025
This study provided a method example for local control stars and missing-row checks. We wrote new code and use individual exposures for the short transits at a different target.
- usesWith baseline shifts within 0.03 mag, fixed 15 day, 0.25 mag dips at 104 or 107.2 days need errors over 0.10 mag on at least 20 ZTF nights in 2022–2025 at J0139+5245
This study establishes the earlier DR24 decline result and motivates the late interval. We add a bound on nights with large errors.