A clip correction reduced mean area estimates for three sound groups in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults; fixed tests failed
We tested the geometry of mean responses to speech, other human voices and animal sounds in separate public human studies. A local development split supplied four people per modality. Fixed tests used 20 other iEEG patients and 16 other fMRI adults. We derived and audited a signed area estimate that corrects finite clip sampling under independent clips, finite second moments and fixed calibration. Ordinary area was positive in every reserved person. Mean corrected scores were 0.024457 and -0.046826; their 95% person intervals were [-0.002351, 0.051265] and [-0.085407, -0.008245]. The shared positive-area test failed, Holm p=0.989686. A development-led test that correction removes over half mean ordinary area also failed, Holm p=0.31575. Descriptive mean decreases were 0.037960 and 0.247368. That summary was chosen after reserved electrical results. It is not a third confirmation. Independent covariance calculations, exhaustive half splits, simulations and source checks support the tool and arithmetic. A nonlinear scalar counterexample shows why area cannot count neural sources. All negative and discordant results remain. The package gives code, permitted inputs, source versions and terms, plans, scores, draws, figures, audits and repeat steps. Different clips, clinical coverage, cohort composition, measurement filters, source selection and uncertain clip independence limit scope. We establish neither shared positive neural area nor a common cause.
human neuroscience · intracranial EEG · fMRI · sound groups · response geometry · sampling bias · signed area · negative result · reproducibility
References
11- usesSite ranks gave mean speech versus animal AUC above 0.5 after training without speech in 20 iEEG patients and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:a5ef832c05cfd2fb1316e3336a3b3fbb4edfebf33108f70c527b561553e3cff7
Licensed compact electrical inputs, source labels, retrieval and mapping code, source receipts and audit code.
- For 165 clips, person t tests kept mean error gains below 1% in maps between one iEEG panel and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:741629b08f64f66669e1f302439669688e90ac1ecef492ffa15f27e43458ceda
Its source audit documented missing patient labels in a different selected electrical panel and informed data choice.
- With clipped acoustic inputs, rank 2 models had lower mean test error than rank 1 for fixed panels from 20 iEEG patients and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:a7ebe1050fc6e865343e629ad39c22ef72edc352e2f1390afdc35c73a0231229
Related fitted acoustic rank comparison; the present mean-pattern area endpoint differs.
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.063
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.20599001
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005508
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2112.09200
- doi:10.7554/eLife.106812.1
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- For two fixed sound panels, rank readers ordered speech above animal sounds and animal sounds above controls on average in iEEG and fMRI
Its three-class mean-area test informs the scope. The present pairwise ordering endpoint differs from area.
- usesA four-class area test failed its shared rule in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults
Its three-group area correction informed this disjoint four-group estimator. Our different class contrasts do not overturn its failed test.