sciscape Publications
← All publications

A four-class area test failed its shared rule in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults

We tested whether human-voice and music contrasts need more than one linear response direction in two separate human studies. Four development people per modality preceded a fixed test in 20 other iEEG patients and 16 other fMRI adults. Four disjoint sound groups defined two contrasts. A correction removed the expected squared-area term from finite clip sampling under independent class samples and fixed calibration. Mean corrected area was 0.030763 in iEEG and 0.209651 in BOLD. Person 95% Student intervals were [0.014559, 0.046967] and [0.142542, 0.276760]. Only 13 of 20 patients had positive scores, compared with 16 of 16 adults. The fixed shared mean, sign and fitted-reference rule failed, p=0.131588. A centered person-and-clip range included zero in iEEG. All negative scores remain. A later exact derivation gives a site-count rule after spatial mean removal: F(p)=p squared divided by (p-1)(p-2), and the mean of F(k) times the k-site score over uniform subsets equals F(p) times the full score. Every electrical three-site subset verified the identity to 3.41e-16. This does not model clinical electrode placement. Acoustic residual scores were positive on average, but calibration noise alone could create residual area in a synthetic example. Neither residual area nor raw area counts neural causes. The package gives a small-memory tool, proof, permitted inputs, source pins and terms, all outcomes, figures and repeat instructions. Unequal cohorts, clips, spatial coverage, preprocessing and source selection limit scope. No positive shared biological or causal claim is made.

human neuroscience · intracranial EEG · fMRI · auditory cortex · representational geometry · unbiased estimation · site sampling · negative result

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

10
  1. usesFor two fixed sound panels, rank readers ordered speech above animal sounds and animal sounds above controls on average in iEEG and fMRI sci:sha256:09a49aff63d8381c88639621a36a1d2be6aec37c6c45e2cddc92b79c0efc5aee

    We reuse permitted compact electrical inputs, source provenance and MIT retrieval code, with attribution.

  2. usesA clip correction reduced mean area estimates for three sound groups in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults; fixed tests failed sci:sha256:39a733bcbd86628b8abdb96ef1022f9311812bbe21c519cb70b85f7c3ae3bfc7

    Its three-group area correction informed this disjoint four-group estimator. Our different class contrasts do not overturn its failed test.

  3. With clipped acoustic inputs, rank 2 models had lower mean test error than rank 1 for fixed panels from 20 iEEG patients and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:a7ebe1050fc6e865343e629ad39c22ef72edc352e2f1390afdc35c73a0231229

    Related rank endpoint for fitted acoustic models in these reused cohorts.

  4. usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.20599001

    Version 1.1 public processed electrical data and source labels, CC BY 4.0.

  5. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.063

    Electrical source study and source processing.

  6. usesdoi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020

    B2021 source human fMRI cohort.

  7. usesdoi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366

    Public author archive supplied the fixed B2021 fMRI derivative.

  8. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069

    Fixed author repository supplied fMRI sound names, source categories and acoustic features.

  9. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035

    Prior work on distinct auditory response components.

  10. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005508

    General framework for representational models.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.