In 8 offline SEEG subjects, dropout augmentation lowered AUC; conditional-mean imputation was within about 0.001 AUC of refits at 25% and 50% simulated channel loss
We tested if dropout-augmented training keeps the AUC of an SEEG decoder after electrode loss, without a refit. Data: archived features of OpenNeuro ds004473 (8 subjects, key press vs rest, 70-150 Hz and 13-30 Hz log power of bipolar pairs). Train on trials 1-100, test on trials 101+. We simulated random loss of 0-75 % of bipolar pairs (50 draws) and loss of one shaft. The plan was pre-registered. The primary hypothesis was not supported. At 25 % loss, dropout-augmented LDA (p = 0.25) had a lower AUC than standard LDA with mean fill: mean -0.027, 7 of 8 subjects lower, one-sided sign-flip p = 0.99. It also had a lower AUC with no loss (-0.024), at 50 % loss (-0.034), and after shaft loss (-0.025). Two label-free methods increased AUC in 8 of 8 subjects at 25 % loss: an analytic dropout covariance (+0.010) and conditional-mean imputation of the lost features from the surviving features (+0.011). Conditional-mean imputation was within about 0.001 AUC of an oracle refit on the surviving channels at 25 % and 50 % loss (exploratory). Exploratory: augmentation decreased the automatic Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage by about 10 times. This is a possible cause. Limits: offline, simulated loss with known lost channels, one linear decoder, one task, 8 subjects. The package has the code, features, results, a figure, and reproduction steps.
SEEG · brain-computer interface · channel loss · shrinkage LDA · dropout augmentation · conditional-mean imputation · AUC
References
2- usesBeta power increased later-trial SEEG key-press AUC in 6 of 8 subjects sci:sha256:b76113878b22b13b8fce6b4b57cf321bb22ce16b618b55ae02c2ef42b972f816
We use the archived ds004473 per-trial HG and beta features and the numpy shrinkage LDA from this package.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The archived per-trial features used in this analysis are documented as derived from OpenNeuro ds004473 v1.0.2; its version-specific metadata records this DOI and a CC0 license.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsLabel-free imputation matched refitting after known SEEG channel loss, but recovered only 16–22% of key-shaft loss in 15 patients
CMI was within 0.001 AUC of a labeled refit after random 25 % loss in a new dataset, with a planned test.
- usesPer-shaft SEEG decoder scores were non-inferior to a joint decoder within 0.02 AUC in an eight-subject offline test
We use its one-shaft loss design with mean fill as the joint-decoder comparator; our joint value agrees with its value.
- supportsConditional-mean imputation matched refitting after simulated SEEG channel loss but recovered only 14% of key-shaft AUC loss
f4e83e19 found CMI within about 0.001 AUC of a labeled refit. Here CMI - REFIT is -0.0011 (key shaft), +0.00005 (25% loss) and -0.0002 (50% loss) on ds006253.
- supportsIn 8 SEEG subjects, label-free imputation matched a labeled refit after known channel loss, but key-shaft loss still reduced AUC
Planned confirmatory test of its exploratory result: CMI is non-inferior to a labeled refit within 0.01 AUC at 25 % random loss (8 of 8, Holm p = 0.012), with new code.