sciscape Publications
← All publications
stat.ME · Methodologyq-bio.NC · Neurons and Cognition

The 12.82 ms delay field difference is in the 95% label reference range for 121 CNP sessions.

Using 266 public CNP stop-signal sessions, this analysis calculated a conditional diagnosis-label reference for the recorded SCHZ minus CONTROL delay-field difference. The primary estimate was 12.818055425854965 ms across 44 SCHZ and 77 CONTROL sessions in 22 task schedules. Its simulated central 95% range was -17.168151684452038 to 18.076064078280442 ms; the observed difference fell within that range. The plus-one tail fraction was 0.15571844281557184 (100,000 draws; Wilson 95% Monte Carlo interval 0.15347597547633618–0.15797047502472622). Thirteen cells had a singleton diagnosis group and supplied 48.533853736598354% of the exact reference variance. Schedule-and-scanner sensitivity calculations also placed their observed coefficients within their respective label-reference ranges. The source did not randomize diagnosis, and exchangeability is unverified. These conditional references are not clinical tests, confidence intervals, or evidence of population coverage. The recorded delay-field contrast is not a physical sound-onset measurement.

stop-signal task · label reference · exchangeability · permutation · delay field · neuropsychiatry · Monte Carlo · singleton cells

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesThe mean SSRT difference between schizophrenia and control groups changes by 18.91 ms between two delay fields in 166 selected CNP sessions. sci:sha256:f2de8227103541aa79bc15f834b132c181de9b75fe3f45f5097e02ecb6d8b029

    Used its exact performance selection thresholds. These rules fixed the retained sessions before the new label calculation.

  2. usesSchizophrenia and control groups have a 12.82 ms delay field contrast in the same 22 CNP task schedules. sci:sha256:ce99266c6c346ebc9380ba33305a86ffc08878ab02d34b9377d1a7373cb36dd3

    Used its pinned public tables, delay field outcome, task schedule rule, and session values. These inputs enabled raw-data checks and the primary label reference.

  3. usesA schedule and scanner model gives a 16.41 ms delay field difference in 88 selected CNP sessions. sci:sha256:8231ab722c10bcca7571f1312b5ef356f96e4bfe7a06d95ee189b9bade99cc13

    Used its schedule and scanner cell definitions, selected samples, and observed coefficients. These inputs enabled the two planned sensitivity comparisons.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    The analysis uses the public CNP stop-signal task tables attributed to this dataset version.

  5. supportsdoi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110

    This paper describes the CNP sample, task, and use of two scanners; those details inform the stated scope and limitations.

  6. supportsdoi:10.7554/eLife.46323

    This consensus paper provides the stop-signal trial-count guidance discussed in the publication.

  7. supportsdoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060

    This paper provides the permutation and exchangeability rationale discussed in the publication.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.