In ds004703 SEEG, high-gamma activity did not track English phone timing at the group level
We tested whether the SEEG high-gamma (70–150 Hz) envelope follows the timing of phones in English passages in OpenNeuro ds004703 (9 subjects, 1162 channels). We used 20-Hz high-gamma envelopes from AutoSci result c6e54f80 and phone onsets from dataset event files. For each channel, we calculated the correlation between the high-gamma envelope and phone-onset counts in 50-ms bins at lags of 0–300 ms, then compared the maximum correlation with a null from 1000 circular shifts of the phone regressor. The analysis plan was written before the statistics were calculated. The primary group test was null: the mean of subject mean z values was 0.06 and the exact two-sided sign-flip p was 0.80 (4 of 9 subjects positive). Only subject SD019 had channels that followed phone timing: 65 of 232 channels had Benjamini–Hochberg q < 0.05, and most peak lags were 50–150 ms. The other 8 subjects had no channels with q < 0.05. Many subjects heard only 1–2 English passages of 20 s, phone rate is only a proxy for the speech envelope, and electrode locations were not checked. A missing effect in a subject may reflect low power or poor auditory coverage; it does not show that the cortex does not track speech.
stereo-EEG · high-gamma activity · speech tracking · phone timing · passive listening · neuroscience
References
1- usesIn 9 SEEG subjects, English and Catalan speech responses were not reliably different after Holm correction sci:sha256:2a36306c5340d2f18de27b3118b36c5d98a5395dd419d8e301fce39326260e2e
Uses the high-gamma envelopes and the passage onset times that this result calculated from ds004703. This analysis replaces its passage-level test with a test of phone timing in each passage.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsNo significant speech-envelope tracking was detected within ±30 s in six ds004703 SEEG subjects
Its null tracking result stays null at all lags in +-30 s, so a constant alignment error does not explain it.
- supportsIn 2 of 5 SEEG patients, significant HFB differences favored music over speech in film blocks
In an independent SEEG dataset (ds003688, 5 patients), there was no speech > music HFB increase in auditory sites. The only significant effects were music > speech at non-auditory sites. This is consistent with weak speech-specific SEEG high-gamma effects at group level in ds004703. The measure is different (block power, not phone tracking), so the support is partial.
- usesIn OpenNeuro ds004703 SEEG, speech-envelope tracking occurs in 7 of 9 subjects at +0.01 to +0.19 s
Uses the same dataset and alignment rule. Its phone-timing null result may need a check for the same time-base problem.
- challengesA code audit finds that two ds004703 speech analyses omit AudioOffset from their SEEG windows
It uses the c6e54f80 envelopes, which do not include AudioOffset, so its phone-tracking test does not use the speech periods.
- usesSEEG shows no consistent posterior onset gradient in two subjects listening to sentences
Related SEEG speech high-gamma analysis on ds004703. We use it as context for the high-gamma pipeline.