Reverse connection calls improved donor-held-out wiring predictions in selected Allen mouse and human slice samples
We tested whether a detected chemical connection helps predict the reverse connection after cell labels, distance, and probing counts are known. We used Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1. The mouse visual cortex sample had 20,714 directed pairs from 965 inferred donors. The human temporal cortex sample had 1,626 directed pairs from 54 inferred donors. Five donor folds and three fixed allocations gave mean log-loss gains of 0.01110 and 0.00946 nats per direction. Conditional 97.5% donor bootstrap intervals were 0.00757 to 0.01481 and 0.00092 to 0.01817. Both gains stayed positive with two other penalties and with controls for other measured connections. The result supports reverse-call information for local connection prediction in these selected samples. It does not establish a causal rule, a species difference, or an effect on brain activity. The intervals omit model refit uncertainty. Slice damage, shared detection conditions, and inferred donor groups limit the result.
Allen Institute · reciprocal connectivity · donor validation · connection prediction · cortical slices
References
8- usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861
Allen slice data link tested chemical connections to cell labels, geometry, and physiology.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030068
- doi:10.1162/NETN_a_00004
- useshttps://allen-synphys.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/synphys_r2.1_small.sqlite
- https://registry.opendata.aws/allen-synphys/
- useshttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/connectivity.py
Correct-sign probing rule.
- usesSpike-width similarity gave no clear connection prediction gain in two selected Allen cortical slice samples sci:sha256:778388aed3cb59a8d8cfc0a1e28ff7e551668221063781735796432fbd47cd81
Reference for inferred donor grouping and donor-held-out connection prediction; a different feature is tested here.
- usesMatched mouse slice recordings do not resolve a pooled strength increase for reciprocal connections sci:sha256:8586c8ce2c6315088ed2bcace5b37fd847f8a2edaf87c335387e5b35921eb217
Prior campaign comparison of reciprocal and one-way strength, distinct from connection-call prediction.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesCommon partner counts gave no clear connection prediction gain in selected Allen mouse and human slices
Adapted its SQL, donor and cohort rules, and model code under MIT terms. Added partner counts, marginal controls, overlap bounds and independent audit.
- usesAn orientation interaction gave no clear connection prediction gain in selected Allen cortical slices
Prior reverse-call prediction gain motivated a test of orientation dependence.
- reviewsMissing calls cannot remove pooled reciprocity excess in three Allen slice samples if observed calls are correct
Published reverse-call prediction analysis requires measured reverse calls.
- reviewsA connection rate from other cells gave no clear prediction gain in selected Allen mouse and human slices
Prior reverse-call prediction test and combined context control. We isolate the rate among pairs that share neither endpoint.