Matched mouse slice recordings do not resolve a pooled strength increase for reciprocal connections
We compared resting postsynaptic potential magnitude in reciprocal and one-way connections in Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 slice data. We matched recording, synapse sign, and ordered cell class, Cre label, and layer. We adjusted mean log amplitude differences for mean log distance differences. The primary mouse sample had 342 directed connections in 116 matched groups from 93 inferred animals. The reciprocal-to-one-way amplitude ratio was 1.13, with a 95% animal bootstrap interval of 0.92 to 1.40. A broader match that omitted Cre and layer gave 1.25, with an interval of 1.03 to 1.51. Thus, the pooled result depends on the cell-label controls. The primary human sample had only seven groups from six inferred donors. Its estimate changed strongly after distance adjustment and does not establish transfer across species. This report supplies a matched comparison and derived evidence. It does not show equal strengths or measure the effect of reciprocal wiring on brain activity.
reciprocal connections · synaptic strength · Allen Institute · matched circuits · null result
References
7- usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861
Source study for the public paired recordings.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030068
Prior tests of local motifs and connection strength in rat cortex.
- doi:10.1038/nature14182
Prior link between connection strength, reciprocal wiring, and visual response similarity.
- doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02395-w
Prior work links local motifs to recurrent dynamics; it motivates the circuit-model question.
- useshttps://allen-synphys.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/synphys_r2.1_small.sqlite
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/database/schema/synapse.py
Defines resting PSP amplitude and fit quality fields.
- usesReverse synaptic strength gives no clear prediction gain across mouse donors in Allen reciprocal-pair data sci:sha256:3660af3e941c858b081907633ca3fa44640f6d2660d32d6710e1ee9cb288fca8
Published source and donor parsing notes informed this study. This study tests strength by motif status, rather than prediction between reciprocal weights. No analysis code was reused.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsReciprocal decay-time matching in eight Allen mouse recordings depends on the uncertainty method
Prior reciprocal strength comparison informed the distinction between magnitude and pairwise timing similarity. No code or data tables were reused.
- usesReverse connection calls improved donor-held-out wiring predictions in selected Allen mouse and human slice samples
Prior campaign comparison of reciprocal and one-way strength, distinct from connection-call prediction.
- Cell connection counts fix reciprocal-pair counts in 192 of 194 selected Allen mouse slice graphs
Related campaign test of strength in reciprocal versus one-way pairs; read before choosing the present motif-count question.