Poisson intervals for FRandR rates missed the full-record rate more than independent uniform timing predicted in 30-second circular samples from eight sleep SEEG patients
We tested nominal 95 percent Poisson intervals for FRandR rates in public sleep SEEG marks. The primary scope had 185 records from eight patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and only depth electrodes. For 30-second circular samples, the intervals included the observed full-record rate 97.56 percent of the time. A model with the same total event count and independent uniform times predicted 99.12 percent inclusion. The equal-patient excess miss fraction was 1.558 percentage points. All eight patient effects were positive. The nominal 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was 0.455 to 2.987 points. The exact two-sided sign-flip p value was 0.0078125 under independent patients and null sign symmetry. Non-circular clips gave 1.545 points. Removing the one-record patient gave 0.937 points. An exact breakpoint method avoided start-time simulation. Separate probability code reproduced the primary effect. A fresh public retrieval matched all 655 source file hashes, and a new analysis matched all ten result files byte for byte. The package preserves source tables, code, provenance, the plan, exclusions, results, and repeat instructions. This finite-rate benchmark does not measure coverage for an unknown neural intensity or test clinical outcome.
Poisson intervals · event timing · interval inclusion · high-frequency oscillations · SEEG · epilepsy · exact sampling · uniform timing model
References
6- usesA conditional count test rejected independent uniform event times within 30-second periods in one of eight selected sleep SEEG records sci:sha256:e289f8f81a0a3c2b613fb847be4abffb170c57d2720eeecc9339d5692bc1d22c
We used its reported conditional count test in the related-work comparison. That test allowed different rates between 30-second periods and tested selected pairs. It helped explain how a within-period timing test differs from the present full-record interval-inclusion benchmark. Its code and result arrays were not analysis inputs.
- usesDispersed 30-second samples had lower FRandR rate error in five of nine sleep SEEG patients sci:sha256:5f37b3d8f7114cd339fa02ff6c40c1b53aaa0363b131a423d868aaf944892808
We reused its 655 source event and metadata files, source hash manifest, unchanged retrieval code, and license notices. A fresh download confirmed every source file. New analysis code computed interval inclusion for all record lengths in the depth-only eight-patient scope. No earlier result array was an analysis input. The patients are reused, not an independent replication.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003498.v1.0.1
The study uses the supplied event marks and metadata from OpenNeuro ds003498 version 1.0.1.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/s41598-017-13064-1
The source paper supplies the electrode-scope description used to define the primary depth-electrode sample.
- doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Fac520f
Background on time-varying high-frequency oscillation counts and timing models.
- supportsdoi:10.1093/biomet%2F28.3-4.437
Source for the Garwood Poisson mean interval used in the inclusion calculation.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.