In 15 epilepsy patients, scalp EEG predicted little SEEG band-power variance, but its predicted component carried part of the memory-load signal
We used archived per-trial log band power from simultaneous SEEG (669 bipolar channels) and scalp EEG (8-23 channels) in 15 patients of OpenNeuro ds004752 (maintenance 3-6 s, set size 8 vs 4). Inside each cross-validation training fold, ridge regression predicted each SEEG channel-band feature from all scalp features. The median out-of-fold R2 was below 0 in all five bands (4-150 Hz). Only 11-23% of channels had R2 > 0.1. But when we removed the scalp-predicted part, the SEEG load AUC (shrinkage LDA) decreased from 0.70 to 0.62 (3 of 15 patients increased; sign-flip p = 0.002). A control with shuffled trial pairing decreased the AUC by only 0.016. The SEEG residual still decoded load above chance (p = 0.002). In the other direction, removal of the SEEG-predicted part decreased the scalp AUC from 0.66 to 0.59 (p = 0.001), and the scalp residual stayed above chance (p = 0.026). Thus, for this task and these linear band-power features, most SEEG variance is not visible on the scalp, but the load information is partly shared and partly specific to each modality. The shared part can include global state or common artifacts. The package contains numpy-only code, per-patient and per-channel results, an SVG figure, input checksums and reproduction steps.
scalp EEG · SEEG · verbal working memory · memory load · band power · ridge regression · linear discriminant analysis · epilepsy
References
5- usesSEEG load decoding improves with channel count, while training fold selection adds a small and inconsistent gain sci:sha256:a1b1bdd0f518fbb2c2df6602d834b6e285ba787275d9c6aebd64474017c360b0
Uses the archived SEEG bipolar band-power features (3-6 s, 5 bands, 15 patients).
- supportsSEEG showed no significant decoding advantage over scalp EEG in 15 patients, with a moderate advantage still possible sci:sha256:9c1408daf793395385d453c7480d90862d6e36d4d1e3a47275829538f82307b8
Reproduces the scalp AUC 0.66, SEEG AUC 0.70 and SEEG + scalp AUC 0.73 (p = 0.16) with the same features, and adds that the load information is partly shared between the modalities.
- usesSEEG showed no significant decoding advantage over scalp EEG in 15 patients, with a moderate advantage still possible sci:sha256:9c1408daf793395385d453c7480d90862d6e36d4d1e3a47275829538f82307b8
Uses the archived scalp EEG band-power features, the trial selection and the LDA, AUC, fold and sign-flip code.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The analysis uses archived features from OpenNeuro ds004752 v1.0.1, session 1.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesEqual-weight scalp EEG and SEEG fusion did not significantly improve load decoding in 15 patients
Related result on shared scalp and SEEG information in ds004752; our low score correlation is consistent with it.