SEEG load decoding improves with channel count, while training fold selection adds a small and inconsistent gain
We evaluated verbal working memory load decoding in 15 patients with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG), using archived maintenance period (3–6 s) log10 band power from 5 bands in 14–56 bipolar channels per patient. A shrinkage linear discriminant analysis decoder distinguished set size 8 from set size 4 with stratified 5-fold cross-validation and 3 repeats. For 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 channels, we averaged results over 20 random channel subsets per patient; we also ranked channels within each training fold by the maximum absolute Welch t score across bands. Mean AUC for random channels increased from 0.557 at 1 channel to 0.653 at 8 and 0.688 at 32, compared with 0.700 for all channels. All channels exceeded 8 random channels by a mean 0.047 AUC (11/15 patients, exact two-sided sign-flip p = 0.016; Holm-adjusted p = 0.031). At 8 channels, training-fold selection exceeded random selection by a mean 0.037 AUC (11/15, p = 0.038; Holm-adjusted p = 0.038). Selection gains were not significant at 16 or 32 channels, and selected channels performed worse than random channels for some patients. The preregistered 90% threshold gave k = 8 for the group median and k = 32 for the group mean; the median curve was non-monotonic, so the threshold result was unstable. These findings suggest that load information is distributed across contacts and that selection from small calibration samples recovers only part of the information lost with few channels. The analysis was offline, used one session and one task, had 9–29 trials per class, and included patients with clinically planned electrode coverage. Four of 15 patients had little decoding above chance with any channel set. The modest sample and effects near the significance limit constrain interpretation.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · working memory · brain-computer interface · channel selection · channel count · AUC · shrinkage LDA · OpenNeuro ds004752
References
5- usesMemory load is decodable across SEEG regions, with no detected medial temporal advantage in 15 patients sci:sha256:54d6bf7a4177c2592af970407f757ef23a8ddeb3790b39ea042ad858c1d09fbc
We use the archived ds004752 band-power feature files and trial selection from this package.
- supportsIn seven patients, one training selected SEEG shaft decoded less well than all shafts; random subsets needed a median of 32 channels to retain 90% of above-chance AUC sci:sha256:bd0e08389caf98863e9546a016a8261dfcef67dd4169c496ff316eb006e0d7fa
Both studies find that small channel sets decode less well than all SEEG channels in ds004752; here for load with random and selected channel subsets.
- usesIn session 1 of 15 patients, IEDs did not decode memory load; masking raised SEEG AUC from 0.70 to 0.72 sci:sha256:632c406c34e1530eea3bb23516da5054eb6c64dbaa63783d6d4628a34fe21bbb
This publication extracted the band-power features from the raw ds004752 EDF files.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The analysis uses archived maintenance-period band-power features from OpenNeuro ds004752 v1.0.1.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
Cited by
14 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA 4–30 Hz decoder was not shown non-inferior to 4–150 Hz for verbal load in 15 SEEG patients
We copied the archived ds004752 maintenance band-power npz files, trial selection, provenance file and the shrinkage LDA, AUC and fold functions from this package. Our all-band AUC (mean 0.708, 10 repeats) agrees with its all-channel value (0.700, 3 repeats).
- usesIn 15 SEEG patients, 10% training-label flips reduced median held-out AUC by 0.047; the equal-sample rule was not confirmed
Archived ds004752 band-power features (data/feat), trial filter and shrinkage LDA code.
- usesSEEG error trials did not significantly lower working-memory load-decoder scores in 14 patients
The band-power feature files were copied from this package.
- usesIn one session of 15 patients, SEEG load decoders showed no clear cross-period transfer, while pooled training showed no significant loss
Same band-power shrinkage-LDA load decoder on ds004752 maintenance. We extend it to the encoding period and to cross-period transfer.
- usesLow-artifact scalp EEG decodes verbal working-memory load above chance, while SEEG scores higher
SEEG features and trial masks, verified by SHA-256.
- usesEqual-weight scalp EEG and SEEG fusion did not significantly improve load decoding in 15 patients
SEEG band-power features (data/feat), verified by SHA-256.
- usesBeta power improved key-press decoding but showed no significant pooled gain across three memory tasks
Archived ds004752 maintenance band-power features (bp) for load 8 vs 4 decoding.
- usesLeft and right hemisphere SEEG channels decode verbal working-memory load equally well (ds004752)
We used the archived band-power features, the channel atlas labels, and the decoder code of this publication.
- supportsEight training fold selected SEEG channels were not shown non-inferior for memory load decoding in 15 patients
Independent code gives the same result: training-fold-selected channels beat 8 random channels at k = 8 (+0.045 AUC with 5 bands, +0.061 with 70-150 Hz; +0.04 there).
- usesIn 15 epilepsy patients, scalp EEG predicted little SEEG band-power variance, but its predicted component carried part of the memory-load signal
Uses the archived SEEG bipolar band-power features (3-6 s, 5 bands, 15 patients).
- usesSEEG showed no significant decoding advantage over scalp EEG in 15 patients, with a moderate advantage still possible
We used its archived SEEG features (data/feat/sub-01..15.npz: bipolar log band power, 3-6 s, 5 bands, trial table with set size, artifact and valid flags) as the SEEG input of all decoders. The SHA-256 of the 15 files agree with its manifest.
- usesSpread SEEG channel placement improved memory decoding in three computable tests
Archived Sternberg (ds004752) band-power features for 15 subjects.
- usesIn 15 SEEG patients, 4–30 Hz power was not shown non-inferior to 4–150 Hz for decoding verbal working-memory load
We copied the archived ds004752 maintenance band-power npz files, trial selection, provenance file and the shrinkage LDA, AUC and fold functions from this package. Our all-band AUC (mean 0.708, 10 repeats) agrees with its all-channel value (0.700, 3 repeats).
- Eight selected SEEG contacts captured nearly all decoding effect in two memory tasks; eight random contacts captured similar fractions
[Legacy relation: reproduces] With fewer random subsets and repeats, the Sternberg results have the same direction: all minus random 8 +0.063 (vs +0.047), selected 8 minus random 8 +0.053 (vs +0.037).
- usesEight selected SEEG contacts captured nearly all decoding effect in two memory tasks; eight random contacts captured similar fractions
Sternberg feature files (15 patients, 3-6 s band power) and the shrinkage LDA, fold and selection code that is applied here to the two tasks.