With one input repeat, a depth prior gave no clear response forecast gain in 178 cells from one mouse retina
We tested whether dendrite depth improves a light response forecast when one repeat is available. The sample had 178 unique ganglion cells in five fields from one Eyewire II mouse retina. We processed each raw fluorescence repeat separately. The first repeat was the input. The mean of four later normalized repeats was the target. Each test excluded a complete field from fitting and parameter choice. The reference used temporal smoothing and a common response prior. A ridge prior from 20 depth features reduced equal-field mean squared error from 0.353760 to 0.352674, a 0.307% decrease. Four fields improved and one worsened. The central 95% range from resampling five fixed field scores was -1.584% to 1.861%. This range is not a confidence interval for mice. Checks with all input repeats and source processing also had ranges across zero. Four of 199 complete anatomy-label controls reached the recorded gain. A later check found that the common prior reduced error by 3.42% beyond smoothing and shrinkage toward zero. A second numerical implementation reproduced the primary field errors within 2.1e-9. Test forecasts did not depend on later responses from the test field. These results limit the added value of this depth prior under this response score. They do not test all structure or identify a synaptic cause. Code, aggregate results, figures, source checks, and repeat instructions are preserved. Original source arrays remain external under their own terms.
retina · structure and function · dendrite depth · calcium imaging · response estimation · Eyewire II · field exclusion
References
3- usesdoi:10.64898/2026.05.28.727403
The Eyewire II study supplies matched electron microscopy and calcium responses. We use the pinned Hugging Face release stated in the main text and provenance. Original arrays remain external under their source terms.
- usesIn 147 ganglion cells from one mouse retina, depth profile similarity gave no clear added gain for movie response similarity in a ridge test with chirp and quality controls sci:sha256:6516feb16326ab25411a67d869a3c900b93ae82864aa5198756592c884df278f
We adapt the MIT source retrieval code and use the pinned source checks. That study tested movie response similarity in the same retina. The new task tests a forecast from one repeat. This is not a biological replication.
- usesDepth overlap gave a 1.27% mean test error decrease for residual calcium correlation in 147 ganglion cells from one mouse retina sci:sha256:a99cec2964866929c84cbb6516e2a27834de634034a5fd7f36bf9ca6c468d4c1
We adapt the MIT source join and trigger alignment. That study tested shared trial variation in the same retina. Our primary test processes raw fluorescence repeats separately.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA 128 ms window shift changed a depth model's error decrease from -6.4% to 20.1% in 178 cells from a second mouse retina
We use its MIT source retrieval code, pinned source index, selected-column content hash, and cache join checks.
- usesA soma position correction improved agreement for opposite motion but left window sensitivity in 178 cells from one mouse retina
Its MIT source retrieval code and source manifests are inherited through the transfer study.