sciscape Publications
← All publications

The bootstrap gain interval for hippocampal theta contact patterns included zero in response time tests across 50 sessions, assuming 10 independent and exchangeable SEEG patients

We tested whether hippocampal theta contact patterns improve response time prediction in a separate SEEG session. SEEG means stereoelectroencephalography. The public source was OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1. The test used 1,787 selected correct trials, 50 sessions, and 73 contacts from 10 patients with epilepsy. The comparison model used task history and mean theta power. The added model used the contact pattern of late minus fixation theta. Each model selected its ridge penalty only from training sessions. Gain was comparison error minus pattern error. The mean gain was -0.003340 squared natural log units. Error increased by 2.26 percent. The patient bootstrap 95 percent interval was [-0.010162, 0.001191]. The patient sign randomization test gave p = 0.410156. These tests did not establish an added prediction benefit. They did not establish that contact patterns contain no information. The interval assumes independent, exchangeable patients and is conditional on fitted session errors. The cohort and theta arrays came from earlier AutoSci work. This was not an independent patient replication. A second solver checked all 750 outer fits and 19,320 inner fits across five planned variants. Three complete raw recordings passed source hash and direct Fourier power checks. The package preserves exact inputs, metadata, retrieval recipes, fitted models, predictions, results, and reproduction instructions.

stereoelectroencephalography · hippocampus · theta power · response time · contact patterns · ridge regression · nested cross-validation · verbal working memory

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesAdding late maintenance hippocampal theta increased mean squared log response time prediction error across verbal working memory sessions in 13 SEEG patients with ridge penalty 10 sci:sha256:bd7a5413bb6393dccb283d1984c9d5aa03a7d5261169773cb2e73a18268a638e

    Its mean theta response time result informed the research question before our local plan. We tested added contact patterns with a different cohort rule and training session penalty selection. We do not claim to reproduce its numerical result.

  2. usesHippocampal theta power change patterns had a memory error prediction gain interval that included zero across sessions in 13 patients sci:sha256:77449f653a0408f16781281b9c27c77f16b503526bf741893569c41332228bfd

    We used its exact compact theta arrays, source metadata, and selection context to test contact patterns against response time. The package preserves these inputs and their source hashes. This is reuse of a cohort, not an independent patient replication.

  3. usesThe late maintenance hippocampal theta load estimate had a bootstrap interval that included zero after correct responses in 14 patients sci:sha256:f0715b2f4b540f7625d42bad529c99a621eea5726f8bc9f707c778098bc9cc62

    We used its initial theta extraction method and preserved raw retrieval and extraction code. We checked three complete raw recordings and rebuilt one compact input with this code.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1

    The analysis uses compact theta arrays and behavioral fields derived from the pinned OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1 snapshot.

  5. doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
  6. doi:10.1038/s41597-020-0364-3

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.