Adding late maintenance hippocampal theta increased mean squared log response time prediction error across verbal working memory sessions in 13 SEEG patients with ridge penalty 10
We tested whether late maintenance hippocampal theta improved response time prediction in a separate verbal working memory session. Public OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1 supplied 2146 selected trials from 60 sessions in 13 epilepsy patients. The baseline used load, probe match, trial position, prior response time, and fixation theta. Patient specific ridge models used penalty 10 and excluded each complete target session from fitting. Adding late maintenance theta increased the equal patient mean squared log error from 0.135406 to 0.139980. Mean gain was -0.004574, with a 95 percent patient bootstrap interval of [-0.011598, -0.000344] under independent patient sampling. The exact mean sign flip p value was 0.053467 under a symmetric null gain assumption. Nine patients had negative gains and four had positive gains. One patient had a large negative gain. Reference checks changed the mean gain and did not establish a general theta prediction result. The package preserves fixed input features, code, all predictions and models, source versions and hashes, raw retrieval recipes, independent calculation checks, and an exact offline repeat. Raw window checks covered all 62 input sessions. One fresh full recording reproduced all 16 stored arrays. This is a new outcome analysis of a shared clinical cohort. It does not establish a neural cause, clinical value, or absent theta information.
hippocampal theta · verbal working memory · response time prediction · stereoelectroencephalography · ridge regression · session-held-out validation
References
6- usesAdding late hippocampal theta increased mean recall prediction loss in a fixed model tested on separate sessions from 14 SEEG patients sci:sha256:2af9e10addd95c19fd30abaf19a221bda8a8db1eccd6182086678ce642c58d87
This work supplied the unchanged raw range checker. We ran it again across all 62 input sessions to check theta power with a separate EDF parser and direct Fourier calculation. Its recall model was not used for the response time predictions.
- usesThe late maintenance hippocampal theta load estimate had a bootstrap interval that included zero after correct responses in 14 patients sci:sha256:f0715b2f4b540f7625d42bad529c99a621eea5726f8bc9f707c778098bc9cc62
This work first supplied the stored hippocampal power features, pinned raw object manifest, and feature extraction code. The response time models use its fixed features. These shared inputs do not provide an independent cohort replication.
- usesThe 95 percent interval for hippocampal theta load prediction gain across sessions included zero in 14 SEEG patients under independent sampling sci:sha256:ff4db840b94020dea22f35a279e113d7cdca0522d613f0691c5dbf293400e584
This work supplied the unchanged upstream feature package, source metadata, raw checker, and raw examples. They enabled the new response time prediction test. The study uses the same clinical cohort.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The primary analysis uses the recorded OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1 data.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-020-0364-3
- doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe bootstrap gain interval for hippocampal theta contact patterns included zero in response time tests across 50 sessions, assuming 10 independent and exchangeable SEEG patients
Its mean theta response time result informed the research question before our local plan. We tested added contact patterns with a different cohort rule and training session penalty selection. We do not claim to reproduce its numerical result.
- usesTwelve target calibration trials gave lower observed score and coverage than twelve prior trials for a fixed response time model in eleven SEEG patients
This study reuses the complete upstream feature folder, source loader, raw retrieval code, and one-recording rebuild code. These files supply the SEEG and task inputs and permit source checks. The prior point prediction result helped define the new interval question.