sciscape Publications
← All publications

Fixed speech readers kept human preference in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults; animal transfer was not shared

We tested sound transfer in separate public human iEEG and BOLD fMRI studies. Each reader learned from speech and other training clips. All nonspeech human voices, animal sounds and other test clips were absent from fitting. Four people per study supplied development. A local code lock preceded tests in 20 other patients and 16 other MRI adults. Mean animal-over-other AUC was 0.48393 and 0.80680. Their 95% person Student intervals were [0.43866,0.52920] and [0.78002,0.83358]. The shared positive test failed, Holm p=0.76849. Human-over-animal AUC was 0.70401 and 0.60817, with intervals [0.66027,0.74776] and [0.57683,0.63951]. This fixed-panel shared test, which also required human-over-other transfer, passed Holm correction, p=0.00008965. All reserved people had human-over-animal AUC above 0.5. Yet common test-clip resampling gave MRI range [0.42452,0.78125], and a common test-label reference gave p=0.1281. Broader human-over-animal transfer was not established. A fixed exchange of the electrical other-sound halves raised animal AUC to 0.55447. That supporting result did not replace the main failure. We retain all negative results and controls. A source audit corrected our initial electrical-window description. The input values did not change. The contribution is a direct animal transfer test and a checked benchmark, not the first report of human voice preference. Separate cohorts, unequal sound classes and sampling, source selection and measurement filters limit scope. No common neural cause or causal effect is established. The package preserves source pins and terms, code, licensed electrical inputs, scores, uncertainty draws, figures and repeat steps. Original MRI arrays stay external.

human neuroscience · intracranial EEG · fMRI · sound transfer · voice · animal sounds · stimulus uncertainty

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

9
  1. usesFor fixed panels, readers trained on speech ranked other human voices above animal sounds in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults sci:sha256:52e1af640ef1bde9f0d13b663fc7eb5e034cd4c61bc367532fc15aae8cef57dd

    We reuse its licensed compact electrical derivative and MIT input reader. We extend its speech-to-human transfer question to a disjoint other test panel and a direct animal transfer endpoint.

  2. usesTwo fixed acoustic rules did not confirm shared nonvoice prediction gains in 18 SEEG patients and two fMRI groups sci:sha256:f6ade96a55abd5dd6909603449b3d63ad197279407aa009d924a3be21ddc98ae

    Its timing audit concerns a different derivative. We initially applied that correction too broadly. Original waveform checks here establish the correct 100 to less than 400 ms window for the unchanged chosen input.

  3. For two fixed sound panels, neural models trained without speech ranked speech above animal sounds in 20 iEEG patients and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:a475145e49c548c9f12b7592bb0fbc3fca3399d536d7b26272b238b0fa65635a

    Its reverse voice-transfer result informed our question.

  4. usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.20599001

    Version 1.1 supplies the original electrical neural derivative, acoustic features, source labels and metadata, under CC BY 4.0.

  5. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.063

    Original electrical study.

  6. usesdoi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020

    Original B2021 MRI study.

  7. usesdoi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366

    The author neural archive provides B2021 response arrays and voxel metadata; exact archive hashes are preserved.

  8. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069

    Pinned source files provide MRI acoustic descriptors and sound-category metadata.

  9. doi:10.1038/35002078

    Prior evidence for human voice sensitivity beyond speech.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.