sciscape Publications
← All publications

For fixed panels, readers trained on speech ranked other human voices above animal sounds in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults

We tested whether neural readers learned from speech also separate other human voices from animal sounds. Separate public studies supplied signed intracranial EEG local field potentials and BOLD fMRI. Four people per study supplied development. The fixed test used 20 other patients and 16 other adults. Each reader learned speech versus non-vocal sounds. Both test classes were excluded from training. Training scaling, clipping, spatial mean removal and vector length removal defined the reader. Mean AUC was 0.7016 in iEEG and 0.6038 in fMRI. The 95% person Student intervals were 0.6563 to 0.7469 and 0.5695 to 0.6382. Every reserved person exceeded 0.5. The fixed shared rule for signs and means passed, p=0.0000153. Sound uncertainty limited this result. Resampling people and training and test sounds with reader refits gave ranges of 0.6167 to 0.7598 and 0.4072 to 0.7832. Thus, the result did not establish broader transfer to new sound samples in fMRI. A common training-label permutation reference gave p=0.0500 in fMRI. An early electrical window and one fMRI repeat did not pass parts of the primary rule. Acoustic-only transfer was strong for the electrical sound panel. A constructed rank-one signal passed the normalization, so successful transfer does not identify several neural sources or a non-acoustic code. A later leading-pattern removal check did not pass the shared sign rule. This is a new endpoint test in reused cohorts. Clinical sampling, prior site selection, separate panels and measurement filters limit scope. The package gives licensed inputs, fixed source versions, all scores, code, uncertainty draws, figures and repeat instructions.

human auditory cortex · voice perception · cross-modal generalization · intracranial EEG · fMRI · stimulus uncertainty · cross decoding

Admitted 14 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesWith clipped acoustic inputs, rank 2 models had lower mean test error than rank 1 for fixed panels from 20 iEEG patients and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:a7ebe1050fc6e865343e629ad39c22ef72edc352e2f1390afdc35c73a0231229

    We reuse its CC BY electrical derivative, fixed source records and MIT fMRI reader.

  2. usesFor two fixed sound panels, neural models trained without speech ranked speech above animal sounds in 20 iEEG patients and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:a475145e49c548c9f12b7592bb0fbc3fca3399d536d7b26272b238b0fa65635a

    Its transfer test in the opposite direction motivated the new endpoint. We reuse its source labels through the cited derivative.

  3. usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.20599001

    Version 1.1 supplies the source electrical responses, acoustic descriptors and sound labels.

  4. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.063

    Source human intracranial study and earlier evidence for graded voice sensitivity.

  5. usesdoi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020

    B2021 supplies the separate 20-person fMRI cohort.

  6. usesdoi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366

    Its fixed author archive supplies the B2021 responses and metadata.

  7. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069

    The pinned source repository supplies fMRI sound classes and acoustic descriptors.

  8. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1075288

    Earlier fMRI evidence that temporal voice area responses extend beyond speech.

Cited by

14 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.